|
|
|
|
|
| ¡¡ |
|
Religion
Á¾±³ ޹æ
|
|
|
·çÅͱ³È¸¡¡
|
|
|
|
|
¡¡ |
|
|
|
Lutheran churches are those religious bodies that trace their
distinctive interpretation of the Christian Gospel to Martin Luther and the
16th-century movements that issued from his reform. They take their place
alongside Anglican and Calvinist communions to make up one of the three
major branches of Protestantism. (see also Index:
Lutheranism) | |
|
The Lutheran churches, originally in Germany but quickly spreading to
Scandinavia, did not wish to be called after their founder. He had seen his
work as an evangelical (i.e.,
Gospel-centred) reform within the Western Catholic church. The name Lutheran
came from opponents of Luther and his reforms, but the epithet eventually
came to be turned into a badge of honour among partisans of the reformer's
interpretation. | |
|
Still, many of the leaders attempted to adopt other terms such as
"Evangelical," which has subsequently become part of the official
name of the church in various nations and territories. Others preferred, and
prefer, to be called The Church of the Augsburg
Confession, a title that recalls the Lutheran document presented by
evangelicals to the emperor at the Diet of Augsburg in 1530. In the 20th
century many have chosen to speak of their church as an "evangelical
Catholic" movement, yet "Lutheran" they became and remain. | |
|
For several decades after 1530 this oldest and largest Protestant body
hardly broke the European geographic bounds that were set for it. It was a
negligible force in Presbyterian Scotland, Anglican England, the Reformed
Lowlands and Switzerland, or in Catholic France, Spain, and Italy. There
were early Lutheran movements in central Europe, as in Hungary,
where the Reformed came to dominate in 1543, and in Transylvania.
But Lutheranism prospered most in the many territories that were eventually
to make up modern Germany and then the northern lands: Finland, Sweden,
Norway, Denmark, and Iceland. | |
|
From this significant but well-defined territory, Lutheranism moved with
substantial numbers into North America after the 1740s and in the 19th
century from European and North American bases into much of the rest of the
world. Still, most of its theological, intellectual, cultural, and political
expression as well as the major trends in its development are best measured
from northern Europe and especially from the German territories that it
shared with Reformed and Roman Catholic Christians. | |
|
Lutherans claim to see their movement centred in the understanding that,
thanks to the saving activity of God in Jesus Christ, they are themselves
"justified by grace
through faith." Early Lutherans invoked this theme against both
Catholic and Reformed Christianity, both of which, though on differing
grounds, they professed to see stressing salvation in part through good
works or moral earnestness. This would be an endeavour to help the believer
make a claim upon God and thus, thought Lutherans, would deprive Christians
of the security of faith and would arrogate to human beings activities that
belonged only to God. In Lutheranism the bond between God and the redeemed
was entirely at God's initiative and through God's grace. The believer
trusts this God. With most other Protestants, Lutherans based their
teachings not on churchly authority but on the divinely inspired Bible. | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
A generation after Luther the churches and territories that followed him
theologically took part in a diet that produced the Peace of Augsburg
(1555). This action accepted the principle cuius
regio, eius religio, which meant that whoever governed a region
determined its religion. It was a far remove from the modern policy of
separation of church and state, for which the reformers could have taken
little credit. Instead there developed what is often called
"territorialism" in confessional
life. Where once there had been one empire and one church, there now were
numerous nations or principalities, each with its own official church. | |
|
The confessional church on territorial grounds compromised the very
nature of a confession, which was to have been a freely accepted creedal
statement. When a ruler chose to take his people into Lutheranism, they had
to follow or suffer penalty, no matter what their deepest convictions. Yet
if they had to accept territorial conformity, they were free to change the
character of its faith through time. Lutheranism passed through numerous
phases and appeared to be quite different in each. | |
|
Conventionally Lutheranism has been seen as having passed through a
series of rather clearly defined stages, with movements of thought and
practice termed Orthodoxy, Pietism, the Enlightenment, and the like. This
convention points to complex realities with sufficient accuracy and thus
serves well for understanding the complex movement after more than four and
a half centuries. | |
|
| |
|
Orthodoxy came to dominate first. Whatever the ordinary people who
rejected Catholic "work-righteousness" and were attentive to
"grace" and "faith" were thinking, their pastoral and
professorial leaders--and, for that matter, their princes, for politics was
much involved in the new definition--grappled with orthodoxy in doctrine and
practice. They did so perhaps out of a Germanic love for order and precision
and more clearly because the first generation of Lutherans
had left them with a rather unstable mix with which they had to deal. | |
|
One strand, most faithful to Luther himself, was more ready to live with
the risky faith and the paradoxes that coloured his preaching and life, but
it then converted the experience of such faith into rather rigid doctrine.
In the second generation these "Gnesio-Lutherans" or "Genuine
Lutherans," who gathered at centres like the university at Jena,
followed impulses to bring order and precision to bear on the thought and
the creeds they had inherited. In the eyes of many historians this party
lost much of the drama and dynamic of Luther's witness. But it was also a
belligerent faction, one that brought passion to its claims on orthodoxy. | |
|
Its opponents were called Philippists, after Philipp
Melanchthon, the chief scholar at Luther's side and the author of the
Augsburg Confession itself. Melanchthon was a humanist with a pacific
outlook, who appeared to be a compromiser, as did his intellectual heirs, in
the eyes of the Gnesio-Lutherans. They accused Philippists of
"synergism," the contention that human beings could cooperate in
the work of salvation. They also saw Reformed tinges in the Philippists'
doctrine of the Lord's Supper. | |
|
By 1577 leaders of the Lutheran parties had agreed on a statement called
the Formula of Concord and in 1580 sealed the Lutheran confessions in the Book
of Concord which has been respected ever since and holds varying degrees of
authority in Lutheran churches. In the century following, Lutheran scholars,
led typically by Johann Gerhard,
wrote the multivolumed Loci Theologici
code names for books that stressed a proper doctrine or place for all
Christian teachings. Scholastic in style, these books of dogma
characteristically began with arguments proving the existence of God and the
full authority of the verbally inerrant Bible. | |
|
| |
|
Orthodoxy bred reaction, and this Orthodoxy, soon perceived as rather
sterile, did not satisfy pastors and people alike. From the 1670s into the
1760s Pietism flourished,
originating again at universities, such as Halle, and spreading from thence
to other schools and congregations. As the name implies, this movement
stressed the piety of the individual or of the small groups of Lutherans who
gathered as smaller "churches within the church" for prayer, Bible
reading, moral scrutiny, and works of charity. Philipp
Jakob Spener, a leader among the Pietists, wanted to remain orthodox
but nonetheless engaged in criticism of what Pietists saw to be the barren
larger Lutheran church of which they remained a part. | |
|
Pietism downplayed doctrinal definition and led to movements that helped
make up the 18th-century German Enlightenment. The tendency of Pietism was
to minimize supernatural
and miraculous elements in Christianity and to stress reason and morality.
Although ordinary worshipers seem to have been sustained by the Scriptures,
hymns, and liturgies that retained these elements, scholars of Lutheranism
initiated radical theological traditions that have characterized German
universities ever since. | |
|
| |
|
In the 19th century the Enlightenment
lived on in more romantic forms that gave a greater place to emotions. Some
of these were philosophically idealistic, some Germanically nationalistic.
At least two schools should be singled out. One, in the tradition of G.W.F.
Hegel, saw Christian development against a huge screen of "thesis"
and "antithesis," and under the great historian F.C. Baur at Tübingen
posed Hebraic versus Hellenic, Catholic versus Protestant motifs and
movements. This school began to cast doubt on fact and event in history and
soon began to speak in terms of biblical myth. Out of it issued radical
movements that led to theological extremism, as found in D.F. Strauss's Life of Jesus Critically Examined, an essay on the impossibility of
writing a life of Jesus. | |
|
The second school, in a Neo-Kantian spirit, stressed biblical fact and
event and issued in a quest for the historical Jesus. Under Albrecht Ritschl
a number of Lutheran and Reformed theologians developed a theology that
stressed morality and the will. Out of their efforts came the well-known
late 19th-century German liberal theology with its devotion to Jesus as
teacher and doer of good. (see also Index:
Neo-Kantianism) | |
|
Thus a kind of intellectual schism emerged among 19th-century German
Lutherans; one school pioneered in the application of historical methods to
biblical studies, developing what came to be known as higher criticism of
the Bible, while the other, in a conservative reaction, established more
pietistic training centres for the clergy. | |
|
Events on the political level also caused schism. Frederick William
III's successful efforts to form a Prussian
Union church with the Reformed in 1817, while at first meeting with
approval, soon prompted a critical reaction. Dissension came partly over
Frederick William's new church order, according to which the territorial
regent was placed into the position of chief bishop of the church, not
because he was the head of state but because he was the person of highest
status in the congregation. This decision was in violation of the Lutheran
tradition regarding the relationship of church and state, and
"confessionalists," who that year celebrated the third centenary
of the Lutheran Reformation,
promoted "back to Luther" movements. Some Lutherans refused to
become part of the Union and formed the "Old Lutheran" church;
others chose emigration. (see also Index:
Reformed church) | |
|
Much of Lutheranism, however, remained obedient to the civil order,
perpetuating a tradition begun by Luther himself. After the break with Rome,
Luther had remained closely tied to the growth of German nationalism and
welcomed the protection of German princes. Many of these became, in effect,
"prince-bishops," with considerable church power. The Lutheran
churches came to be established by law and supported by taxes in Scandinavia
and in many parts of Germany. Further, Luther had a fear of anarchy and a
predisposition to grant considerable power to the state as an instrument of
order. While he himself was "civilly disobedient" in the face of
the emperor in the 1520s, neither his theological vision nor his personal
inclination led him to endorse revolution or radical critique of the state.
Lutheranism, therefore, was generally obedient to the civil order, and its
clergymen were often cast in roles that made them seem to be lower-level
civil servants. | |
4.
| |
|
¡¡ | |
|
| |
|
Lutheranism was carried rather quickly from Germany to Bohemia and
Austria, Poland and Hungary (where it remained a minority party), and then
to the Scandinavian
nations. There much of the proselytizing impulse came through universities,
especially when scholars from north European schools studied in Germany and
carried Lutheran ideas back north. Already in the 1520s and 1530s Denmark
made its move to Lutheranism under the influence of its successive kings. A
former monk, Hans Tausen, who became a convinced Lutheran, was the major
theological influence. | |
|
Norway was in many ways a dependency of Denmark when about 1525 King
Frederick I encouraged Lutheran preaching in Bergen. Norway followed Denmark
into the orbit of Augsburg Confessionalism, as did Iceland, by importing
Lutheranism from Denmark. Sweden's political restlessness similarly led that
emerging nation to turn Lutheran under King Gustav I Vasa after 1523. Olaus
Petri, a student at Wittenberg during the years of Luther's reform, brought
conviction and passion to the task of spreading Lutheran ideas in Sweden.
Although the King and Petri or his reformer colleagues often were in
conflict, Petri's reformation ideas prospered. In Finland, Michael Agricola,
still another former Wittenberg student, translated the New Testament and
books of worship and helped Finland make a transition to Lutheranism before
his death in 1557. | |
|
Scandinavian universities and churches generally followed developments
parallel to those in Germany, albeit with a special accent on 19th-century
Pietist revivals in Norway and Sweden that would make their impact through
immigration to America. The major drama of Scandinavian Lutheranism occurred
in 19th-century Denmark. There N.F.S.
Grundtvig represented a romantic "folk-church movement,"
and Hans Martensen a kind of official church idealism. S©ªren Kierkegaard
issued a devastating critique of both in the name of an existentialist
encounter with Jesus, bypassing established and, he thought, dead
Christendom. | |
|
| |
|
American Lutheranism inherited both the Orthodox Confessionalism and the
Pietism of the Continent. Enlightenment rationalism, however, was rarely
advocated. The Lutherans began to go in large numbers to New York, the
Carolinas, and especially Pennsylvania in the 1740s, where they were often
gathered by the Lutheran patriarch Henry
Melchior Muhlenberg. Many who went to America were poor, and some
arrived as exiles or protesters against imposed conformity. Handicapped by
their relatively late arrival and the fact that they spoke languages other
than English and tended to live in rural enclaves, they had less impact on
politics and culture than might be assumed, given the record of their
counterparts in Europe. | |
|
Because Lutherans came from many nations, spoke many different
languages, were propelled by a variety of motives, and were guided by
leaders either unaware of or competitive with one another (as, for instance,
"Pietists" versus "Confessionalists"), they tended to be
isolated. As they became aware of one another, they became contentious. In
the mid-19th century, for instance, a shaping influence was Samuel S.
Schmucker, a Gettysburg (Pennsylvania) Seminary professor, who advocated
Americanization and cooperation with the Reformed evangelical churches.
Partly in reaction, the more Lutheran Confessional-minded Charles
Porterfield Krauth, also at Gettysburg, stressed Lutheran distinctiveness.
More militant in his defense of 17th-century orthodoxy was the great shaper
of the Missouri Synod, Carl F.W. Walther, who was president of both the
synod and its principal seminary, Concordia, at St. Louis. Walther advocated
a policy that forbade Lutherans from communing or praying together if their
synods were not in complete doctrinal agreement with one another. | |
|
The majority of American Lutherans were of German descent and were often
suspect in the Anglo-Saxon milieu. They did not, in the main, support
Prohibition and other Protestant social causes. Some retained the German
language and were, generally falsely, suspected of German loyalties during
World War I. In response they set out to prove themselves superpatriots and
after the war they became more Americanized than before. | |
|
Through two centuries American Lutherans gathered about 8,000,000
Christians into scores of church bodies. In the 20th century, especially
after 1918, they had a tendency to merge, and 5,500,000 of them united three
bodies to become the Evangelical
Lutheran Church in America (ELCA) in 1988. The largest non-ELCA group
was the 2,500,000-member Lutheran
Church-Missouri Synod, which saw trends toward liberalism and
ecumenical expression in the larger body that it did not welcome. Canadian
Lutheranism, about 300,000 strong, is divided chiefly into two bodies
parallel to the ELCA and the Missouri Synod in the United States and is
strongest in Ontario and the Western provinces. | |
|
In the United States the ELCA constituency is chiefly northern. One
large wing thrives in and around the states where Lutheranism first arrived:
Pennsylvania, New York, Virginia, and the Carolinas. Another resulted from
19th-century immigrations from Scandinavia and Germany to the upper Midwest,
with Minnesota having the largest number. The Missouri Synod has less
strength in the East and is strongest also in the upper Midwest and around
the Great Lakes. After World War II, partly through population mobility and
partly through conscious efforts to found new congregations, Lutheranism
came to be more of a national presence. | |
|
Lutherans in America developed an extensive network of seminaries,
beginning at Gettysburg and Philadelphia, when it was seen that they could
not depend upon clergy sent by agencies in Germany and Scandinavia. Most
Lutheran groups founded colleges of their own, many of which remain strong
church-related liberal arts institutions. The Missouri Synod and a smaller
and still more isolated Wisconsin Synod established a flourishing network of
parochial elementary and, in some cases, high schools. Originally these were
shaped by a defensive mentality bent on sheltering the young from public
school life. In more recent decades the schools have tended to attract
non-Lutheran constituencies and to see themselves less as competition than
as complements to public schools. | |
|
| |
|
In the 20th century, after the moral collapse of World War I, Lutherans
along with the continental Reformed reacted against the humanistic
liberalism that they felt failed to do justice to the radical difference
between the divine and the human. There was a revival of biblical theology,
often on existentialist grounds, as in the work of Rudolf Bultmann at
Marburg, Ger. Historians like Karl Holl helped inaugurate a Luther
renaissance. In Sweden Gustaf Aulen and Anders Nygren inspired theological
revivals that stressed certain profound motifs in Christian and Lutheran
thought. | |
|
To its shame, much of Lutheranism was silent or even concurrent when
Hitler came to power and provided some intellectuals and some pastors for
Nazi Church ("German Christian") leadership. At the same time,
some of the neo-orthodox Lutherans joined with the Reformed in 1934 to
establish a Confessing Church.
In Martin Niemöller and Dietrich Bonhoeffer in Germany, Kaj Munk in
Denmark, and Bishop Eivind Berggrav in Norway, it brought forth anti-Nazi
heroes and, in some cases, martyrs. (see also Index:
National Socialism) | |
|
"Mission fields" around the world--established in the 19th
century from the Continent and from North America chiefly in the first half
of the 20th century--later became younger churches. After the middle of the
20th century many of these showed a vitality that was disappearing or had
gone from churches in Europe. In South West Africa/Namibia and elsewhere in
Africa thousands gathered to worship and to use their churchly vision for
meeting their political problems. Thus in South West Africa/Namibia, a
territory under the domain of South Africa, Lutheran church members
participated in the leadership of revolutionary organizations, contributing
to the establishment of an independent Namibia in 1990. The Lutheran
Christians thus developed a pattern different from the characteristic
Lutheran one of passivity in politics or conservatism in the face of change. | |
|
In its northern homelands Lutheranism was anything but an expanding
force after the mid-20th century. Yet, through the Lutheran World Federation
and countless vital agencies and institutions, Lutherans continued to find
ways of expressing the faith they had heard Martin Luther proclaim. They
also took responsible parts in the formal ecumenical movement of the century
in their endeavour to stress both their "evangelical" and their
"catholic" sides. (M.E.M.) | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
The official teaching of the Lutheran churches is that of the Book
of Concord (1580), which contains the three ancient creeds
(Apostles', Nicene, and Athanasian), the Augsburg Confession, the Apology
of the Augsburg Confession, Luther's Schmalkaldic Articles, Luther's
Small and Large Catechism,
Melanchthon's "Treatise on the Power and Primacy of the Pope," and
the Formula of Concord. Of these Lutheran symbols only the Augsburg
Confession and Luther's Small
Catechism are accepted by all Lutheran churches. No general confessions
of faith were adopted after 1580 by the Lutheran churches, although
other doctrinal statements have served a confessional purpose for particular
churches. (see also Index: Nicene Creed,
Athanasian Creed) | |
|
Partly because of the circumstances of its composition and partly
because the Reformers understood their work to be a restoration of
Christianity amidst contemporary corruptions, the Augsburg Confession
emphasizes the continuity of the Lutheran teaching with the ancient
Christian Church. | |
|
| |
|
The teaching centres in the Gospel, or "justification": the
doctrine that men "are justified freely on account of Christ through
faith when they believe that they are received into grace and their sins
forgiven on account of Christ, who by his death made satisfaction for our
sins"; God "imputes [this faith] as righteousness in his
sight" (Augsburg Confession, IV). Modern Lutheran theologians, among
them Rudolf Bultmann and Paul
Tillich, have applied this doctrine about grace to doubt as well as
to guilt and have called attention to the change in the cultural and
religious situation since the 16th century. Thus, Tillich interpreted
justification through faith as a person's accepting his having been accepted
in spite of unacceptability. | |
|
This doctrine ("the article by which the church stands or
falls") provides the key for understanding the Bible (Apology, IV. 3-5)
as a book that has two kinds of content--law and promises. Law demands a
perfect inward as well as outward obedience to the divine will, which reason
can never achieve. As such it drives men to despair, but the despair is
conquered by the promise that God justifies the unjust man. This means that
in Lutheran theology, in the act of being justified before God, the human
being recognizes no positive or constructive role for the law. "The law
always accuses," always destroys what the sinner had thought would
impress God. God then effects a new creation by producing the new and
justified person in Christ. Theologically, the doctrine of justification
gives a Christocentric (i.e., what
honours Christ) stress and a practical (i.e.,
whether afflicted consciences are consoled) emphasis to the other
articles of faith. | |
|
| |
|
Lutheranism has a doctrine of human nature that defines the natural
state as one in which humans do not fear or love God and are self-seeking.
Human beings have freedom of will concerning the outward observance of laws
(civic righteousness) but not before God (where they are inevitably
unrighteous). They have a knowledge of God but not a true knowledge (they
think, for example, that righteousness is what God has rather than what God
gives). (see also Index: free
will) | |
|
Similarly, the meaning of predestination is to be sought not in the hidden
counsel of God but in his revelation (Formula of Concord, Epitome XI).
Lutheran teaching differs from the Calvinist
double predestination by accepting the formal inconsistency of saying that
believers are predestined to salvation without saying that unbelievers are
predestined to damnation, for the purpose of the article on predestination
is to console the troubled conscience. The mechanism of predestination has
been the subject of controversy within Lutheranism (whether the decision of
God is made "in view of faith"), but the basic position expressed
in the symbols has been maintained. | |
|
| |
|
In opposition to the claim that the Roman
Catholic Church was the only legitimate ecclesiastical organization,
as well as to the biblicist demand to restructure the Christian Church
according to the New Testament pattern, the Augsburg Confession (Art. VII)
defines the church as the "congregation of saints [believers] in which
the gospel is purely taught and the sacraments rightly administered."
"Gospel" is interpreted to mean that God justifies believers on
account of Christ, not on account of their merits (Augsburg
Confession, V). Right administration includes the practice of
communion under both kinds (bread and cup). For the unity of the church it
is sufficient to agree concerning the gospel and administration of the sacraments.
This is the formula Lutherans use to build ecumenical relations with other
churches. But it also brings difficulties, for the meaning and degree of
"agreement" are always difficult to define and measure. | |
|
Luther regarded the church as essentially hidden or invisible. Although
it is as weak and sinful an institution as any other one, it is possible to
believe that God works in and through the church because it is founded on
God's word. | |
|
This doctrine has undergone transformations since the 16th century.
Orthodoxy and Pietism
understood the invisibility of the church to mean that only God knows who
among the assembled people are true believers (the invisible church as
distinguished from the visible congregation). In the 19th century a
sacramental-institutional conception was formulated by some Lutheran
theologians (e.g., the German leader Wilhelm Löhe), a congregational
conception by others (e.g., the
conservative American C.F.W. Walther), a national or folk conception by
still others (e.g., the Danish
leader N.F.S. Grundtvig), and a historical-evolutionary conception (i.e., the church as the first actualization of the Kingdom of God to
be progressively realized in history) by others. Though these differences
radically divided the Lutheran bodies in the 19th century, particularly in
America, today Lutherans tend to live with different conceptions of church
polity without letting such matters divide them. | |
|
Of the three sacraments (baptism,
Lord's Supper,
penitence-absolution) recognized by Luther and the Lutheran confessional
writings, which are called symbols, in the Book
of Concordthe
Lutheran churches generally hold to two by combining absolution
in part with baptism (daily repentance
is the repeated actualization of baptism) and in part with the Lord's Supper
( confession and
absolution). The criterion used in determining the number of sacraments was
that they were actions instituted by Christ and connected with God's promise
(Apology XIII). The symbols do not define the relation between word and
sacraments except to say that they come together, and both have the effect
of creating and strengthening faith. This is a rejection of the view that
sacraments are effective ex opere
operato (operative apart from faith) and that they are only memorial
actions. | |
|
The Formula of Concord's
teaching on the Lord's Supper is that Christ is bodily present "in,
with, and under the bread and wine" (Solid Declaration, 35 ff.,
adopting Luther's terminology over Melanchthon's
"with the bread and wine"). The Formula of Concord left open the
question whether Christ is present in the sacrament because he is present
everywhere, as one party contended, or whether he is present in the
sacrament because he chooses to be. (see also Index:
Real Presence) | |
|
In the 19th century some Lutherans (e.g.,
Gottfried Thomasius) distinguished word and sacrament by saying that the
sacraments are intended for man's natural life as the word is for his
conscious personal life. This view in some cases was carried so far (e.g., in Martensen and Friedrich Stahl) as to subordinate the word
(as the presentation of salvation) to the sacrament (as the participation in
salvation). | |
|
The ministry is
conceived of as a service in word and sacrament but not a special status.
Every baptized Christian is a priest by status (universal priesthood
of believers), but the public preaching and administration of
sacraments devolves upon "rightly called" ministers, who are
priests by office. | |
|
| |
|
The Lutheran churches generally have understood the relation of church
and state on the basis of God's two ways of ruling in the world (two
kingdoms). Through the "laws, orders, and estates" of the world
God rules by compelling external obedience through fear and threat of
punishment. Through preaching
and sacrament he rules in apparent weakness by converting the human heart.
This conception has provided Lutherans with a basis for understanding the
constitutional separation of state and church in the United States. | |
|
The two domains of power and grace
are interdependent because the word alone cannot preserve peace and
justice--the civil government must even protect the freedom of the church to
proclaim the Gospel--and civil power cannot effect salvation. Lutheranism
has rejected the view that civil power is of itself evil, as well as the
view that civil obedience has merit for salvation
in the sight of God. (see also political power, civil
disobedience) | |
|
To define a citizen's relation to government one may say that in
ordinary circumstances a Christian obeys the powers that be (except in
matters of faith) as the agent of God's rule. But if a law or government is
unjust, a Christian has the right and duty to resist it, passively accepting
the consequences of disobedience for himself but actively defending his
fellow man against that law or government. If the government is tyrannical,
a Christian not only resists but rebels. Those Christians who also are
holders of civil power have an obligation to resist and oppose misuse of
such power by other rulers (as the territorial princes opposed the emperor
in Luther's time). Lutheran scholars are not in complete agreement, but many
would associate this view with Luther himself. In the 20th century it was
developed by figures like the Norwegian bishop Eivind Berggrav, who resisted
the Nazis. | |
|
In the 19th century the romantic view of the national state as
expressing the spirit of a people was widely influential, but later it
became suspect because of the demonic character of nationalism in the 20th
century. | |
|
| |
|
The Lutheran Confessions, unlike the Reformed, have no article on
Scripture, although the Formula of Concord does designate the Scriptures of
the Old and New Testaments as the "sole and most certain rule" for
judging teachings and teachers. | |
|
Toward tradition the
attitude of Luther and the confessions was conservative; they retained
whatever did not conflict with the Gospel of justification through faith.
They viewed the written tradition of the church fathers as useful for
interpreting the Scriptures but not as a source or norm of teaching. Some
Lutheran theologians in the 19th century developed an organic view of the
relation of the two (i.e., Scripture
contains a truth that is unfolded in the course of history) not unlike that
of the Roman Catholics Johann Möhler and John Henry Newman. | |
|
| |
|
Lutheran teaching on ethics is determined by the perspective of the two
kingdoms--the domain of law is not to be confused with that of the
Gospel--and by the relation of faith and love implicit in justification.
Works of love are the result, rather than the condition, of faith. Human
beings have freedom from concern with self by the act of God and are enabled
to direct their concern to other human beings. The works a person is to do
are specified in part by his status in the world (as parent, ruler, subject,
and other roles). Though early Lutherans thought of status in more natural
terms (as "orders of creation"), recent Lutherans have given the
concept a historical reference (e.g., a
person's particular destiny). A person's calling is to do well whatever his
status requires. A second factor defining the works a person is to do is the
concrete need of fellow human beings. | |
|
| |
|
Lutheran teaching has been shaped in part by the theological
controversies in its history, almost all of which were at one time divisive.
They had to do with such questions as the relation between divine and human
agency (synergistic controversy, predestinarian controversy); whether works
are indifferent, necessary, or dangerous for salvation (antinomian
controversy, Majoristic controversy); whether in a state of confessional
disagreement any questions are neutral (adiaphoristic controversy); what the
nature of the sacramental presence is; whether the divine power resides in
the Scriptures only when they are being used or also apart from their use
(Rathmann controversy); what are sufficient grounds for church unity
(syncretistic controversy); and whether God's election of believers is made
"in view of faith" or not (predestinarian controversy). | |
|
| |
|
| |
|
The worship service
also was affected by the theology of the Reformers. Luther's "German Mass"
of 1526 reflects changes that began about 1523. Apart from shifting the
emphasis from sacrifice to thanksgiving, Luther's chief innovation here was
to take the words of institution out of the framework of prayer
and make of them a proclamation of the Gospel. This change has been
preserved to the present day, although there is now a tendency to put the
words again into a eucharistic prayer. | |
|
Because of the Reformers' emphasis upon the importance of the word, the sermon
took an essential place in the service. Preaching is usually based upon a
biblical text, a biblical story or doctrine, or a theological theme. Partly
in reaction to the 19th century, there is an effort to keep preaching
biblically oriented, though not necessarily tied to specified texts. | |
|
The term mass, at first retained, is not normally used except in the
Church of Sweden (högmessa)
as a name for the main service of worship. The other minor services
disappeared from use during the 17th century, though some have been
recovered in the liturgical reforms of the last century. Only Matins and Vespers
are used with any regularity. | |
|
The basic order of service in most Lutheran churches is the same. It
consists of two main portions (preaching and sacrament) in which the Kyrie,
Introit, Gloria, Credo, and Agnus Dei are incorporated. Under the impact of
the liturgical movement in the 20th century the didactic emphasis has given
way to an emphasis on celebration in the service. Liturgical revisions
(Swedish order of 1942, German of 1954, in the United States in 1941, 1958,
and 1978) have brought an even greater uniformity in the basic order. They
have also restored communion as a normal part of the regular Sunday service. | |
|
Lutherans observe two sacraments, baptism and the Lord's Supper
(communion, Eucharist). The common practice is to baptize children and
adults who have not been baptized previously. The frequency of communion has
increased in recent years, but there are still many congregations where it
is celebrated only once a month or less often. Though the usual practice has
been that only those who have been confirmed may participate in the
Eucharist, in 1970 the Lutheran Church in America and the American Lutheran
Church approved participation for 10-year-old baptized children, whether
they have been confirmed or not. | |
|
The rites of the
Lutheran churches are confirmation,
ordination, marriage,
and burial. In the rite of
confirmation (usually between the ages of 10 and 15) a member makes public
profession of the faith received in baptism. In the rite of marriage the
church ceremony may replace the civil ceremony or it may serve as an
invocation of blessing on the civil ceremony. Ordination of the clergy
does not endow its members with a special character or give them a special
status, but it sets them apart for the particular office of preaching the
word and administering the sacraments. This rite is interpreted either
institutionally (i.e., preaching
is an order instituted by Christ and transmitted from generation to
generation [succession]) or congregationally (i.e., the congregations call certain of their members to assume the
functions of preaching and administering the sacraments for them). In 1970
the Lutheran Church in America and the American Lutheran Church approved the
ordination of women, a
practice carried over in the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, which
came into being from a merger in 1988. There is no sacrament of extreme
unction, but there is a burial service for the dead. | |
|
An important role was played in the Reformation by hymns,
which not only conveyed the evangelical teaching but also allowed for
popular participation in the church services. The best-known Lutheran hymns
come from the period of the 16th and 17th centuries (e.g.,
"A Mighty Fortress Is Our God" by Luther, "All Glory Be
to God on High" by Nikolaus Decius, "O Sacred Head Now
Wounded" by Paul Gerhardt, "Wake, Awake, for Night Is Flying"
by Philipp Nicolai, "Now Thank We All Our God" by Martin Rinkart).
But each nation has made its contribution (e.g.,
Thomas Kingo in Denmark and Norway), and Lutheran hymnals today include
hymns from many ages, nations, and communions. | |
|
Among the composers of choral music (cantatas, motets, masses, settings
of the Passion of Christ) Johann
Sebastian Bach ranks highest (e.g.,
Mass in B Minor, St. Matthew Passion, and St. John Passion). But other composers of importance were Michael
Praetorius, Heinrich Schütz, and Dietrich Buxtehude. To this music
should also be added the Scandinavian
folk tunes (e.g., L.M. Lindeman in
Norway). | |
|
| |
|
Education of the laity and clergy was an early problem for the
Reformers. The means developed to meet it have had a formative influence on
Lutheranism to the present day. (see also Index:
religious education) | |
|
To instruct the people in Christian teaching, Luther not only translated
the Bible into the vernacular but also wrote his Small and Large
Catechisms (1528-29). The small one was to be used by heads of
households to instruct those under their care. It includes not only the
three parts that had been in use before (the Ten Commandments, the Creed,
and the Lord's Prayer) but also three additional parts on baptism, the
Lord's Supper, and absolution. Each topic in the various parts is connected
with an explanation in the form of an answer to the question, "What
does this mean?"--a device Luther used in order to avoid mechanical
memorization. (see also Index: "Small
Catechism", catechism) | |
|
The Small Catechism, with various expositions, has remained a basic
instructional tool in the Lutheran churches, though it has been supplemented
by other materials (e.g., Bible
courses, Sunday school literature, projects). | |
|
In the 20th century efforts have been made to connect the secular world
and the Christian tradition by establishing institutions such as the
academies for laity in Europe (which provide opportunity for regular
meetings of persons from specific vocations to discuss the relevance of
Christianity to those vocations) and the church colleges in the United
States. | |
|
| |
|
The polity of the Lutheran churches varies from country to country. The
Church of Sweden has maintained the episcopal
succession unbroken, and congregations there are given great freedom to
appoint their own pastors. The Danish Church lost but later regained the
episcopacy. In Norway there is a closer tie between church and state than in
the other Scandinavian countries. Since 1869, by an arrangement with Russia,
the Finnish Church is independent of state control but is supported by
public funds. | |
|
Until the end of World War I the churches in Germany were under secular
authority, administered by a commission of laity and clergy, a system that
grew out of the emergency situation of the Reformation. After the collapse
of the government in 1918, the churches drew up new constitutions placing
the congregations under a General Synod
in some provinces and under a bishop in others; and the several provincial
churches (Landeskirchen) were
united in the German Evangelical Church Federation (1922). At the end of
World War II, after the conflicts under Hitler, the Evangelical Church in Germany was organized
under Bishop Theophil Wurm and Pastor Martin Niemöller, adopting the
Declaration of Barmen (1934) as a binding statement. The United Evangelical
Lutheran Church of Germany, formed in 1948, became a unit within the
Evangelical Church in Germany. (see also Index:
Barmen Declaration) | |
|
In the United States the Lutheran churches have the same denominational
standing as other churches. The polity is congregational, but in a complex
form in which congregations yield some authority to synods on regional and
national levels. Elected heads are called presidents in some Lutheran
bodies, but in the largest, the Evangelical Lutheran Church of America, they
are bishops. | |
|
Besides these larger Lutheran churches there are a number of Lutheran
free churches in Europe (e.g., Evangelical
Lutheran [Old Lutheran] Church, Germany) and in the United States (e.g., Church of the Lutheran Confession), which have complete
congregational autonomy. | |
|
The Lutheran World Federation,
established in 1947, is a cooperative organization. | |
|
|
|
[ Lutheranism ]
[ Ȩ ] [ À§·Î ] [ ·çÅͱ³È¸ ] [ °³Çõ, Àå·Î±³È¸ ] [ ¼º°øÈ¸ ] [ ħ·Ê±³È¸ ] [ ȸÁß±³È¸ ] [ Á¾±³Àû Ä£¿ìȸ ] [ °¨¸®±³È¸ ] [ ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ Á¦ÀÚȸ ] [ ÀϽÅ, ¸¸Àα³È¸ ] [ Àç¼¼·ÊÁÖÀÇ ]
|
|
¡¡ |
¡¡ |
¡¡ |