¡¡

Jesusi.com Homepage

¡¡

¡¡

 °Ô½ÃÆÇ  °Ë»ö  ÀÚ·á½Ç  »çÀÌÆ®¸Ê  ¿¹¼ö¿Í³ª?

[ µÚ·Î ] [ Ȩ ] [ À§·Î ] [ ´ÙÀ½ ]

¡¡
Religion

Á¾±³ ޹æ

V. Beliefs and practices

½ÅÁ¶¿Í °üÇàµé

1. FAITH

½Å¾Ó

1) Concepts of faith.

½Å¾ÓÀÇ °³³ä

The idea of faith shared by all Christian churches is rooted in the New Testament. But the New Testament idea of faith is not simple, and it permits a breadth of meaning that has led to variations even within a single Christian communion. Most modern interpreters of the New Testament would agree to a description of New Testament faith as a total commitment of the self to God revealing himself in Christ. Yet it is doubtful whether the post-Reformation theology of any Christian church has presented faith simply in these terms.

Even before the Reformation, faith in Roman Catholicism had developed an emphasis that is not rooted in the New Testament but can be traced back to the Alexandrian school of theology and to Augustine. Faith appeared primarily as acceptance of revelation, and revelation appeared as a revelation of doctrine rather than as revelation of a person. This emphasis ultimately was formulated in the 13th century by Thomas Aquinas in a definition of faith--canonized by the Council of Trent and the first Vatican Council--as an intellectual assent given to revealed truth by the command of the will inspired by grace and motivated by the authority of God revealing.

The Reformers, with Martin Luther as the leader, rejected this idea of faith as nonbiblical and exclusively doctrinal; it seemed to place the teaching authority of the Roman Catholic Church between man and God not as a means of communication but as a replacement of God. Luther saw faith as confidence in the saving power of grace. This, Luther believed, was a return to the New Testament faith, but Roman Catholicism rejected this as a mere sentiment; these positions were crystallized up to the 20th century. At the risk of oversimplification, it is possible to say that both represented exaggerations of the New Testament. New Testament faith is more than either trust in the saving power and will of God or assent to revealed truth, although neither element can be entirely excluded. Efforts were wasted in trying to prove the adversaries wrong rather than in trying to understand the New Testament. The documents of the second Vatican Council reflect a shift in Roman Catholic theology from emphasis soley on faith as intellectual assent to recognition of faith as a loyal adherence to a personal God.

Roman Catholic theology, having chosen the option of faith as assent, was faced with the problems of showing that it was a rational assent rather than an irrational assent and of maintaining that faith was a deliberate and free meritorious act under the inspiration of grace. At first glance the two problems seem to cancel each other out; one can maintain one affirmation only by denying the other. (see also Index: reason)

¡¡

¸ðµç ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ ±³È¸°¡ °øÀ¯ÇÏ´Â ½Å¾Ó¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °ü³äÀº ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡ ±Ù°ÅÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½Å¾à¼º¼­ÀÇ ½Å¾Ó °ü³äÀº ´Ü¼øÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç, ±× ÀÇ¹Ì´Â ÆøÀÌ ³Ð¾î ´ÜÀÏÇÑ ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ °øµ¿Ã¼ ¾È¿¡¼­Á¶Â÷µµ ´Ù¾çÇÏ°Ô ÀÌÇØµÈ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ Çö´ë ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ ÇØ¼®°¡µéÀº ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ½Å¾ÓÀ» ±×¸®½ºµµ ¾È¿¡¼­ ÀÚ½ÅÀ» °è½ÃÇϽô ÇÏ´À´Ô²² ÀÚ½ÅÀ» ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ ³»¸Ã±â´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î Á¤ÀÇÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù.

2) Preambles and motivation of faith.

½Å¾ÓÀÇ Àü(îñ)´Ü°è ¹× µ¿ÀÎ

The study of the problems connected with faith involves the investigation of what are called the preambles of faith and also of the motivation of faith. The preambles of faith include those processes by which the believer reaches the conclusion that it is reasonable to believe--e.g., the proof of the existence of God by the use of one's own reason. The freedom of faith is respected by affirming that this conclusion is as far as the preambles can take one. This process as proposed is a theoretical construction that actually occurs in no one, but the analysis can be of value in uncovering the psychological processes that occur without reflection. The preambles include the study of the scientific and historical difficulties raised against the Christian fact (i.e., the incarnation, Resurrection, Ascension, and glorification of Jesus Christ) itself or against the Roman Catholic interpretation and proclamation of the Christian fact or against the Roman Catholic claim to be the exclusive custodian of revealed doctrine and the means of salvation. These studies were efforts to show what cannot be shown by scientific and critical methods, but in the exaggerated claims of their defenders they showed that faith was a necessary conclusion of a valid rational process. Such a faith could be neither free nor the result of grace.

The study of the motivation of faith attempted to meet this difficulty. Some earlier analyses candidly presented faith as resting on evidence and clumsily postulated a movement of grace necessary to assent to this particular evidence. Normally, one "wills" to believe something because the evidence is not compelling; thus, people choose to believe that the candidate of their choice has the qualities desired for the office, although the evidence is less than overwhelming. The Roman Catholic thinks this is an assent to the probably rather than the certainly true and yet insists that the certainty of faith is the highest of all certainties. Ultimately, the Roman Catholic analysis must say that the evidence that belief is reasonable can never be so clear and convincing that it compels the radical deviation from worldly patterns that assent implies. At this point, the will inspired by grace chooses to accept revelation for other reasons than the evidence.

The motive of faith that has been presented by Catholic theologians is "the authority of God revealing." It is held that the preambles of faith show beyond reasonable doubt that God exists and that he has revealed himself. This evidence and an acceptance of the notion that, if God reveals himself, he does so authoritatively motivate a person to make the act of faith. The problem with such an analysis has been to define how the authority of the revealer is manifest to the believer. It seems that the notion of the authority of God revealing must be an object of faith rather than a motive, because the conjunction of this authority with the fact of revelation cannot be the object of historical experience. In the mid-20th century this dilemma caused an increasing number of Catholic theologians to move closer to a view that emphasized faith as a personal commitment to God rather than as an assent to revealed truth.

¡¡

½Å¾Ó°ú °ü·ÃµÈ ¹®Á¦µé¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸¿¡´Â ¼ÒÀ§ ½Å¾ÓÀÇ Àü´Ü°è¿Í ½Å¾ÓÀÇ µ¿Àο¡ ´ëÇÑ Á¶»ç°¡ Æ÷ÇԵȴÙ. ½Å¾ÓÀÇ Àü´Ü°è¿¡´Â ¹ÏÀ» ¸¸ÇÑ ÀÌÀ¯°¡ ÀÖ´Ù´Â °á·Ð¿¡ ½ÅÀÚµéÀÌ µµ´ÞÇÏ°Ô µÇ´Â °úÁ¤ÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵȴÙ. ÇÑ °³ÀÎÀÌ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ À̼ºÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿© ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ Á¸À縦 Áõ¸íÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ÇÑ ¿¹ÀÌ´Ù.

°¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº ½Å¾ÓÀÇ µ¿ÀÎÀÌ '°è½ÃÇϽô ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ±ÇÀ§'¶ó°í ¼³¸íÇØ¿À°í ÀÖ´Ù. ½Å¾ÓÀÇ Àü´Ü°è¸¦ °ÅÄ£ »ç¶÷Àº À̼ºÀûÀÎ ÀǽÉÀ» ¶Ù¾î³Ñ¾î ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇϰí ÀÚ½ÅÀ» °è½ÃÇÑ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹Ï°Ô µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. °è½ÃÇÏ´Â ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ±ÇÀ§¶ó´Â °ü³äÀº µ¿ÀÎÀ̶ó±âº¸´Ù ½Å¾ÓÀÇ ´ë»óÀÎ µíÀÌ º¸ÀδÙ. ¿Ö³ÄÇϸé ÀÌ ±ÇÀ§¿Í °è½Ã »ç½ÇÀÇ °áÇÕÀº ¿ª»çÀûÀÎ °æÇèÀÇ ´ë»óÀÏ ¼ö ¾ø±â ¶§¹®ÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ µô·¹¸¶ ¶§¹®¿¡ 20¼¼±â Á߹ݿ¡ ¿Í¼­´Â ½Å¾ÓÀÌ °è½ÃµÈ Áø¸®¸¦ µû¸£´Â °ÍÀ̶ó±âº¸´Ù ÇÏ´À´Ô²² ÀÚ½ÅÀ» ÀΰÝÀûÀ¸·Î À§Å¹ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÓÀ» °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â °ßÇØ¿¡ µ¿Á¶ÇÏ´Â °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀÇ ¼öÈ¿°¡ Áõ°¡ÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù.

¡¡

3) Heresy

ÀÌ´Ü

Heresy is the denial by a professed, baptized Christian of a revealed truth or that which the Roman Catholic Church has proposed as a revealed truth. The unbaptized person is incapable of heresy, and the baptized person is not guilty of "formal" but only of "material" heresy if he does not know that he denies a revealed truth. The seriousness with which Roman Catholicism regarded heresy is shown by the ancient penalty of excommunication. Civil penalties, including the supreme penalty, did not appear until the Constantinian age. Lesser civil disabilities continued in force, although the law was often ignored, into the 20th century. Protestant governments often borrowed some of this severity from Roman Catholic governments.

Roman Catholic theologians often deal with heresy, paradoxically, as a necessary step in the development of dogma. In order to save themselves from an extremely crass and even cruel rationalization, they point out that the questions raised by heresy were legitimate but that heretics too quickly assumed a one-sided and exclusive view of doctrine that they wished to impose on the entire church. Modern studies have sometimes been less kind to such champions of orthodoxy as Athanasius and Cyril of Alexandria, who were not themselves free of one-sided views and who showed themselves unwilling to listen to their adversaries with sympathy and understanding. In recent times most of the theses of Modernism (a movement to change the Catholic Church by means of radical renovation), which were condemned vigorously by Pius X in 1907, have found their way into Catholic theology. This may have something to do with the absence of the words heresy and heretics from the acts of the second Vatican Council. Like the use of the word church for Protestant churches, this indicates a substantial change of attitude toward a genuinely ecumenical position.

¡¡

ÀÌ´ÜÀº ½Å¾ÓÀ» °í¹éÇÏ°í ¼¼·Ê¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ±×¸®½ºµµÀÎÀÌ °è½ÃµÈ Áø¸®¸¦ ºÎÀÎÇϰųª ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸°¡ °è½ÃµÈ Áø¸®¶ó°í ÀÎÁ¤ÇÑ °ÍÀ» ºÎÀÎÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ´ÜÀÌ ¼º¸³µÇ·Á¸é 3°¡Áö ¿ä°ÇÀÌ ÇÊ¿äÇÏ´Ù. ù°, ±×°¡ ¼¼·Ê¹ÞÀº ½ÅÀÚÀ̾î¾ß Çϰí, µÑ°, °è½ÃµÈ Áø¸®, Áï ±³¸®¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿À·ù³ª ÀǽÉÀÌ ÀÖ¾î¾ß Çϸç, ¼Â°, ¿À·ù³ª ÀǽÉÀ» Áö¼ÓÇÏ·Á´Â ¿Ï°íÇÑ ÀÇÁö°¡ ÀÖ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸°¡ ÀÌ´Ü¿¡ ´ëÇØ ½É°¢ÇÏ°Ô ´ëóÇß´Ù´Â °ÍÀº °í´ëÀÇ ÆÄ¹® Çü¹ú¿¡ Àß ³ªÅ¸³ª ÀÖ´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ ÀÌÈÄ¿¡´Â ÀÌ´ÜÀÇ °³³äÀÌ ´Þ¶óÁ³´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ À̴ܰú ÀÌ´ÜÀÚ¶ó´Â ¸»À» ÇÇÇϰí, ´ë½Å °¥¶óÁø ºñ(Þª)°¡Å縯 ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ÀΠȤÀº °¥¶óÁø ÇüÁ¦¶ó ºÎ¸¥´Ù.

¡¡

2. REVELATION

°è½Ã

1) The concept of revelation.

°è½ÃÀÇ °³³ä

Although other religions have ideas of revelation, none of these bears a close resemblance to the idea of revelation found in the Old and New Testaments and in Christianity. Roman Catholic theologians distinguish between revelation in a broad sense, which means knowledge about God deduced from nature and man (and therefore actually philosophy), and revelation in the strict formal sense, by which they mean the utterance of God. This latter idea, of course, can only be conceived by analogy with the utterance of man, and its precise definition involves difficulties.

The earliest idea of revelation is the one found in the Old Testament in which the speech of God is addressed to Moses and the prophets. They in turn are described as quoting the words of God rather than interpreting them. Jesus, the fulfillment of the prophets, does not speak the word of God; he is the word of God. This phrase, which occurs only in the opening verse of both the Gospel and the First Letter of John, has become a technical term in theology; Jesus is the Incarnate Word. As such he is both the revealer and the revealed. He reveals the Father both by what he says and by what he is. Thus, the earliest Gospel (literally "good news") is the account of the life, death, and Resurrection of Jesus. The Gospel as the recital of his words appears in a later phase of development. (see also Index: logos)

It has been noted that the Roman Catholic Church has regarded revelation primarily as the revelation of propositions rather than the revelation of a person. Thus, even Jesus has been thought of more as a spokesman who tells of God than as a reality who himself in his being and actions manifests God. Though this latter aspect is found to some extent in the documents of the second Vatican Council, it has normally been considered only in the miracles of Jesus, which have been regarded in Roman Catholic apologetics as works of divine power that assure the credibility of the words of Jesus. These words, which were spoken in a particular historical context, have been preserved in a twofold way. They are written in the Gospels, which together with the Old Testament form a book of revelation that is distinct from the spoken words; but, because the Bible itself is written under divine inspiration, it has the same authority of revelation as the spoken words of Jesus. The Roman Catholic Church also preserves the words of Jesus, independently of the Bible, in its traditional teaching; but it does not utter the very words spoken by Jesus, and thus its words have a lower formal quality of revelation than the words of the Bible, although they are of equal authority. The idea of a book of revelation was taken by the early Christian Church from Judaism when it accepted the sacred books of the Jews as its own, just as it accepted the God of Judaism as the Father whom Jesus claimed for his own.

¡¡

´Ù¸¥ Á¾±³¿¡µµ °è½ÃÀÇ °ü³äÀÌ ÀÖÁö¸¸, ¡´±¸¾à¼º¼­¡µ¡¤¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿Í ±×¸®½ºµµ±³¿¡¼­ ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â °è½ÃÀÇ °ü³ä°ú Èí»çÇÑ °ü³äÀ» Áö´Ï°í ÀÖ´Â Á¾±³´Â ¾ø´Ù. ¼º¼­´Â '°Å·èÇϽоßÈÑ ÇÏ´À´Ô'ÀÌ °è½ÃÀÚÀÓÀ» ºÐ¸íÈ÷ Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¼º¼­ÀÇ °è½Ã´Â °¡Àå °Å·èÇÑ Á¸ÀçÀÚÀÎ ÀΰÝÀû ½ÅÀÌ ÀÚÀ¯·ÎÀÌ ÀÚ±â ÀÚ½ÅÀ» µå·¯³½´Ù´Â µ¥ ±× Ư»öÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº ±¤ÀÇÀÇ °è½Ã¿Í ¾ö¹ÐÇÑ °ø½ÄÀû ÀǹÌÀÇ °è½Ã¸¦ ±¸ºÐÇϰí Àִµ¥, ÀüÀÚ´Â ÀÚ¿¬°ú Àΰ£À¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ¿¬¿ªµÇ´Â ÇÏ´À´Ô¿¡ ´ëÇÑ Áö½Ä(½ÇÁ¦·Î´Â öÇÐ)À» ÀǹÌÇϸç, ÈÄÀÚ´Â ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ¸»¾¸À» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸°¡ °è½Ã¸¦ º»·¡ ÇÑ Àΰݿ¡ °üÇÑ °è½Ã¶ó±âº¸´Ù´Â ½ÅÁ¶¿¡ °üÇÑ °è½Ã·Î °£ÁÖÇØ¿Ô´Ù´Â °ÍÀº ÁÖ¸ñÇÒ ¸¸ÇÑ Á¡ÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ¿¹¼ö±îÁöµµ ÀÚ½ÅÀÇ Á¸Àç¿Í ÇàÀ§¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀ» µå·¯³»´Â ÇϳªÀÇ ½ÇÀç(ãùî¤)·Î »ý°¢Çϱ⺸´Ù ¿ÀÈ÷·Á ÇÏ´À´Ô¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸»ÇÏ´Â ´ëº¯ÀÚ·Î »ý°¢ÇؿԴÙ.

¡¡

2) The content of revelation.

°è½ÃÀÇ ³»¿ë

The proper content of revelation is designated in Roman Catholic teaching as mystery; this theme was important in the documents of the first Vatican Council. The development of the theme of mystery responded to those intellectual movements of the 18th and 19th centuries that are called by such titles as the Enlightenment, Rationalism, scientism, and historicism. To the Roman Catholic Church these movements were threats to the idea of a sacred revelation; they appeared to claim that human reason had no frontiers or that human reason had demonstrated that revelation was historically false or unfounded or that the content of revelation was irrational. The affirmation of mystery meant that the reality of God was unattainable to unaided human reason; theologians had long used the word incomprehensible, which says more than modern theologians wished to say. Mystery refers both to the divine reality and to the divine operations of the world. These operations can be observed only in their effects; the operation itself is not seen, nor is its motivation seen. The plan of God, which is realized in history, is mysterious. The first Vatican Council insisted that the existence of God and of a moral order is attainable to reason, and some of the fathers of the council wished to state that these truths were imposed upon reason by the evidence, a step that the council did not choose to take. Mystery does not mean the incomprehensible or the unintelligible; it means, in popular language, that man cannot know who God is or what God is doing or why God is doing it unless God tells him. Mystery also means that, even when the revelation is made, the reality of God and his works escapes human comprehension.

The term supernatural has been used in Roman Catholic theology since the 17th century to designate not only revelation but other aspects of the divine work in the world. The term has an inescapable ambiguity that has led many modern theologians to avoid its use. The "natural" that the supernatural presupposes is the world of human experience; the quality of this experience is not altered by technological and social changes as long as these are fulfillments of the potentialities of nature. Indeed, it is the spectacular growth in the knowledge of these potentialities in modern times that leads to doubt as to whether there can be a supernatural at all. The supernatural reality is identified with God in his reality and in his operations. This is a reality that man cannot create or control. The supernatural in cognition is this reality as it is perceptible to man; it is, for man, simply unknown as far as unaided reason can move. The first Vatican Council affirmed that without revelation human reason has not reached anything but a distorted idea of the divine and an imperfect idea of the moral order. This means also that human beings are unaware of their destiny, either individually or collectively, without revelation and that they are unable to achieve it without the entrance of the supernatural into the world of history and experience. (see also Index: nature, philosophy of)

Contemporary theologians of revelation are aware of the problems raised by historical and literary criticism that render it impossible to cherish the primitive idea of revelation as the direct utterance of God to man. Roman Catholic theologians have not found a satisfactory way of describing revelation, but they do not see that the destruction of a naive idea of revelation destroys the whole idea. Theologians also recognize that the older idea of revelation of propositions as a collection of timeless and changeless verities, almost like a string of pearls, is no longer tenable. Every utterance that is called revelation was formed in a definite time and place and bears the marks of its history. There is no revealed proposition that cannot be restated in another cultural situation. Indeed, contemporary theologians are aware that these propositions must be restated if the Roman Catholic Church is to speak meaningfully in the modern world. Roman Catholicism does not accept the possibility of a new revelation; it believes that reason can never completely penetrate the "mystery" and that it must continue the exploration of the mystery that has already been revealed.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â °è½ÃÀÇ °íÀ¯ÇÑ ³»¿ëÀÌ ½Åºñ¶ó°í °¡¸£Ä¡´Âµ¥, ÀÌ ÁÖÁ¦´Â Á¦1Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ ¿¡¼­ Á߽õǾú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ´Â ÃÊÀÚ¿¬Àû °è½Ã°¡ ±× º»Áú»ó ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÌ ½º½º·Î ÀÚ½ÅÀ» Àηù¿¡°Ô ¿­¾î º¸ÀÏ ¶§ ¼º¸³µÈ´Ù°í õ¸íÇÔÀ¸·Î½á °è½ÃÀÇ °³³äÀ» ¼ø¼ö Áö¼ºÀûÀ¸·Î Ãß±¸ÇÏ·Á´Â °æÇâÀ» ¹èôÇß´Ù. ÃÊÀÚ¿¬Àû °è½Ã´Â ÇÇÁ¶¹°ÀÇ ÀÚ¿¬Àû ÀÎ½Ä °¡´É¼ºÀ» ¶Ù¾î³Ñ´Â ÇϳªÀÇ ½Åºñ¶ó´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. Åë¼ÓÀû ¾ð¾î·Î Ç¥ÇöÇÏ¸é ½Åºñ´Â ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÌ ¸»ÇØ ÁÖÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸é Àΰ£Àº ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÌ ´©±¸°í ¹«¾ùÀ» ÇÏ´ÂÁö, ¿Ö ±×°ÍÀ» ÇÏ´ÂÁö ¾Ë ¼ö ¾ø´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ Àΰ£ À̼ºÀº È¥ÀÚÀÇ ´É·Â¸¸À¸·Î´Â ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ½ÇÀç¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø±â ¶§¹®¿¡ °è½ÃÀÇ ³»¿ëÀ» ½Åºñ¶ó°í ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ½Åºñ´Â °è½Ã°¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁú ¶§¿¡µµ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ½ÇÀç¿Í ±×ÀÇ ÀϵéÀº Àΰ£ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ¸¦ ¹þ¾î³­´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ·± °üÁ¡¿¡¼­ ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº ½Åºñ¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¿À·§µ¿¾È ºÒ°¡ÇØÇÏ´Ù´Â ¸»À» »ç¿ëÇØ¿Ô´Ù. ½Åºñ´Â ½ÅÀû ½ÇÀç¿Í ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¼¼°èÀÇ ¿î¿µ ¸ðµÎ¿¡ °ü·ÃµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ½ÅÀûÀÎ ¼¼°èÀÇ ¿î¿µÀº ±× °á°ú¸¦ ÅëÇØ¼­¸¸ ÀÎ½ÄµÉ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ¿î¿µ ±× ÀÚü´Â º¸ÀÌÁö ¾ÊÀ¸¸ç ±× µ¿Àεµ ¿ª½Ã º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù.

Çö´ëÀÇ °è½Ã½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº °è½Ã¸¦ Àΰ£¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ Á÷Á¢ÀûÀÎ ¸»¾¸À̶ó´Â ¿ø½ÃÀûÀÎ °è½Ã °ü³äÀ» À¯ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù´Â Á¡À» °£ÆÄÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº °è½Ã¸¦ ¸¸Á·½º·´°Ô ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â ¹æ¹ýÀ» ¾ÆÁ÷ ã¾Æ³»Áö ¸øÇßÀ¸³ª, °í·çÇÑ °è½Ã °ü³äÀ» ŸÆÄÇÑ´Ù°í ÇØ¼­ °è½ÃÀÇ ÀüüÀûÀÎ °ü³äÀÌ ÆÄ±«µÈ´Ù°í »ý°¢ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â »õ·Î¿î °è½ÃÀÇ °¡´É¼ºÀ» ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù. À̼ºÀº °áÄÚ ½Åºñ¸¦ ²ç¶Õ¾î º¼ ¼ö ¾øÀ¸¸ç, µû¶ó¼­ ÀÌ¹Ì °è½ÃµÈ ½Åºñ¸¦ °è¼Ó ޱ¸ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù°í ¹Ï°í ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

3. TRADITION AND SCRIPTURE

¼º¼­¿Í ¼ºÀü(Àü½Â)

In Roman Catholic theology tradition is understood both as channel and as content. As channel it is identical with the living teaching authority of the Catholic Church. As content it is "the deposit of faith," revealed truth concerning faith and morals. In Roman Catholic belief, revelation ends with the death of the Apostles; the deposit was transmitted to the college of bishops, which succeeds the Apostles.

The Reformers contended that the Roman Catholic Church had imposed teachings that were not contained in the Scriptures, and this Protestant objection has been maintained in modern times. The objection was raised more intensely when the Immaculate Conception of Mary, the mother of Jesus (Pius IX, 1854), and her Assumption (Pius XII, 1950) were defined as dogmas. For neither of these is there any biblical evidence; more significantly, there is no evidence in tradition for either before the 6th century.

The Roman Catholic Church recognizes that the Bible is the word of God and that tradition is the word of the church. In one sense, therefore, tradition yields to the Scriptures in dignity and authority. But against the Protestant slogan of sola Scriptura ("Scripture alone"), itself subject to misinterpretation, the Roman Catholic Church advanced the argument that the church existed before the New Testament. In fact, the church both produced and authenticated the New Testament as the word of God. For this belief, at least, tradition is the exclusive source; and this furnished a warrant for the Catholic affirmation of the body of truth that is transmitted to the church through the college of bishops and preserved by oral tradition (meaning that it was not written in the Scriptures). The Roman Church therefore affirmed its right to find out what it believed by consulting its own beliefs as well as the Scriptures. The Council of Trent affirmed that the deposit of faith was preserved in the Scriptures and in unwritten (not in the Bible) traditions and that the Catholic Church accepts these two with equal reverence. The council studiously avoided the statement that they meant these "two" as two sources of the deposit, but most Catholic theologians after the council understood the statement as meaning two sources. Protestants thought it meant the Roman Catholic Church had written a second Bible.

Only in contemporary Catholic theology has the question been raised again, and a number of theologians believe that Scripture and tradition must be viewed as one source. They are, however, faced with the problem of nonbiblical articles of faith. To this problem several remarks are pertinent. The first is that no Protestant church preaches "pure" gospel; they have all developed dogmatic traditions, concerning which they have differed vigorously. It is true, on the other hand, that they do not treat these dogmatic traditions "with equal devotion and reverence" with the Bible. The second is that the early Christian Church through the first eight ecumenical councils (before the Eastern Schism in 1054) arrived at nonbiblical formulas to profess its faith. Protestants respond that this is at least a matter of degree and that the consubstantiality of the Son (i.e., that he is of the same substance as the Father), defined by the Council of Nicaea, is more faithful to the Scriptures than the Assumption of Mary.

Roman Catholics and Protestants should be able to reach some consensus that tradition and Scripture mean the reading of the Bible in the church. Protestants never claimed that a man and his Bible made a self-sufficient Christian church. The New Testament itself demands that the word be proclaimed and heard in a church, and the community is formed on a common understanding of the word proclaimed. This suggests a way to a Christian consensus on the necessity and function of tradition. No church pretends to treat its own history of belief as nonexistent or unimportant. By reading the Scriptures in the light of its own beliefs it is able to address itself to new problems of faith and morals that did not exist in earlier times or to which the church did not attend.

Catholic theologians of the 19th century dealt with the problem under the heading of development of dogma. To a certain extent the question can be reduced to epistemology (i.e., theory of knowledge): is a new understanding of an ancient truth a "new" truth? The problem does not arise out of faith; Sir Isaac Newton's observations of falling bodies consisted of nothing that people had not seen for thousands of years. Yet the effects of Newton's insights and calculations altered an understanding of the universe and the actions of people within the universe. The problem is important in theology because of the necessity of basing belief on the historical event of the revelation of God in Christ. Unless the link is maintained, the church is teaching philosophy and science, not dogma. Hence, the Roman Catholic theological teaching has tended to say that dogma develops through new understanding, not through new discoveries.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯Àº ¼º¼­¿Í ÇÔ²² ¼ºÀü(á¡îî) ¶Ç´Â Àü½Â(îîã¯)À» ¹Þ¾ÆµéÀδÙ. °Å·èÇÑ ÀüÅëÀ» ¶æÇÏ´Â '¼ºÀü'¿¡´Â ¿©·¯ °¡Áö Àǹ̰¡ ÀÖÁö¸¸, °¡Àå ÀϹÝÀûÀÌ°í ³Î¸® ¾Ë·ÁÁø ¿ë·Ê´Â ±â·ÏµÇÁö ¾ÊÀº ÇüÅ·Π±³È¸ÀÇ ÃÊâ±âºÎÅÍ ÀüÇØ ³»·Á¿À´Â °¡¸£Ä§°ú ½ÇõÀû °üÇàÀ» °¡¸®Å°¸ç, ±â·ÏµÈ ¼º¼­ÀÇ ¸»¾¸°ú Çü½Ä»ó ±¸º°µÈ´Ù.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀº ¼ºÀü ¶Ç´Â Àü½ÂÀÌ ¸Å°³ÀÇ ±â´ÉÀ» ÇÒ »Ó¸¸ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ±× ÀÚü°¡ ³»¿ëÀ» °®°í ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀ¸·Î ÀÌÇØÇÑ´Ù. ¸Å°³·Î¼­ ¼ºÀüÀº °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ »ì¾ÆÀÖ´Â ±³µµ±Ç°ú µ¿ÀϽõȴÙ. ¼ºÀüÀÇ ³»¿ëÀº ½Å¾Ó°ú µµ´ö¿¡ °üÇØ °è½ÃµÈ Áø¸®, Áï '½Å¾ÓÀÇ ÀúÀå¹°'ÀÌ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½Å¾Ó¿¡¼­ °è½Ã´Â »çµµµéÀÇ Á×À½°ú ÇÔ²² ³¡³ª¸ç, ±× ÀúÀå¹°Àº »çµµµéÀ» °è½ÂÇÏ´Â ÁÖ±³´Ü¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ¾ú´Ù°í º»´Ù.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¼º¼­°¡ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ¸»¾¸À̰í, ¼ºÀüÀº ±³È¸ÀÇ ¸»¾¸ÀÓÀ» ÀÎÁ¤Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ±³È¸°¡ ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ ÀÌÀü¿¡ Á¸ÀçÇß´Ù´Â ³íÀǸ¦ ÁøÀü½ÃÄ×´Ù. »ç½Ç»ó ±³È¸´Â ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¸¦ »ý±â°Ô ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ±× ¼º¼­°¡ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ¸»¾¸ÀÓÀ» È®Áõ½ÃÄ×´Ù. ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ ÀÌ·± ¹ÏÀ½¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­ ¼ºÀüÀº À¯ÀÏÇÑ ¿øÃµÀÌ´Ù. ¹Ù·Î ÀÌ °ü³äÀº Áø¸®ÀÇ º»Ã¼°¡ ÁÖ±³´ÜÀ» ÅëÇØ ±³È¸¿¡ Àü´ÞµÇ°í, ±¸Àü (ÀÌ ¸»Àº ¼º¼­¿¡ ±â·ÏµÇÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÀ½À» ÀǹÌ)¿¡ ÀÇÇØ º¸Á¸µÇ¾î¿Ô´Ù´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ ÁÖÀå¿¡ ´ëÇØ ±Ù°Å¸¦ Á¦°øÇØÁÖ¾ú´Ù.

±×¸®½ºµµ±³ ½Å¾ÓÀÇ ±ÔÁØÀ¸·Î '¼º¼­¿Í ÇÔ²² ¼ºÀüµµ ÀÎÁ¤ÇØ¾ß ÇÑ´Ù'´Â °¡Å縯ÀÇ ÀÔÀåÀº '¼º¼­¸¸' ÀÎÁ¤ÇÏ´Â °³½Å±³ÀÇ ÀÔÀå°ú »ç½Ç»ó ¸Â¼­¿Ô´Ù. °³½Å±³ÀÇ ¼º¼­ À¯ÀÏÁÖÀÇ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ °¡Å縯ÀÇ ÁÖ¿ä¹Ý·ÐÀº, ¼º¼­ ÀÚü°¡ ¸ðµç °è½Ã¸¦ ´Ù °£Á÷Çϰí Àִٰųª ½Å¾ÓÀÇ À¯ÀÏÇÑ ±ÔÁØÀ̶ó°í ÁÖÀåÇÑ ±¸ÀýÀÌ ¼º¼­¿¡ ¾ø´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¾ç½Ä ºñÆò(åÆãÒÝëøÄ)ÀÌ ÀÔÁõÇϰí ÀÖ´Â ¹Ù¿Í °°ÀÌ ¼º¼­´Â È÷ºê¸® ÀüÅë°ú »çµµµéÀÇ ÀüÅëÀÌ ³ºÀº ¹®ÇÐÀû »ê¹°À̱⿡ ±×·¯ÇÑ ÀüÅëÀÌ ¾ø¾ú´Ù¸é ¼º¼­´Â Á¸ÀçÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾úÀ¸¸ç, µû¶ó¼­ ¼º¼­¸¦ ¼ºÀüÀ̶ó´Â º»·¡ÀÇ ¹è°æ¿¡¼­ ºÐ¸®¡¤µ¶¸³½ÃÄÑ ¹ö¸®¸é ¼º¼­°¡ °¡Áö´Â º»·¡ÀÇ °¡Ä¡¿Í »ý¸í·ÂÀ» ¾ø¾Ö´Â °á°ú°¡ µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¡¡

4. THE TEACHING AUTHORITY OF THE CHURCH (THE MAGISTERIUM)

±³È¸ÀÇ ±³µµ±Ç(ÎçÓôÏí)

1) The concept of teaching authority.

±³µµ±ÇÀÇ °³³ä

The Roman Catholic Church claims for itself a teaching authority that is unparalleled in the Christian community. The Reformation was primarily a rebellion against the teaching authority, and the Reformers did not claim for their own churches the authority they rejected in the Roman Church.

To teach with authority means that the teacher is able to impose his doctrine upon the listener under a religious and moral obligation. This moral obligation does not flow from the nature of teaching, which of itself imposes no obligation upon the learner; the learner is morally obliged only to assent to manifest truth. Instead it flows from the understanding that the Roman Church derives its teaching authority from the commission given by Jesus to the Apostles as contained in the New Testament ("He who hears you hears me"). But whereas the response of the hearers of the Apostles was faith, the response of the Roman Catholic is expected to go beyond faith. The Apostles were presumed to speak to those who did not yet believe, whereas the Roman Catholic Church imposes its teaching authority only upon its members. The definition of the teaching authority must show that these modifications do not exceed the limits of legitimate doctrinal development.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ´Ù¸¥ ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ °øµ¿Ã¼¿¡¼­´Â À¯·Ê¸¦ ãÀ» ¼ö ¾ø´Â ±³µµ±ÇÀ» ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù. Á¾±³°³ÇõÀº ±Ùº»ÀûÀ¸·Î ÀÌ ±³µµ±Ç¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¹Ý¶õÀ̾úÀ¸¸ç, Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀº ±×µéÀÌ ·Î¸¶ ±³È¸¿¡¼­ °ÅºÎÇÑ ±³µµ±ÇÀ» ÀÚ±âµéÀÇ ±³È¸¿¡¼­ ÁÖÀåÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡ ³ª¿Í ÀÖµíÀÌ("³ÊÈñÀÇ ¸»À» µè´Â »ç¶÷Àº °ð ³ªÀÇ ¸»À» µè´Â »ç¶÷ÀÌ´Ù") ¿¹¼ö°¡ Á¦Àڵ鿡°Ô °¡¸£Ä§ÀÇ ±ÇÇÑÀ» À§ÀÓÇÑ °Í¿¡¼­ ±³µµ±ÇÀÇ À¯·¡¸¦ ã´Â´Ù. ±×¸®½ºµµ´Â °¡¸£Ä¡´Â Á÷¹«¸¦ »çµµ´ÜÀÇ ±¸¼º¿øÀÎ »çµµµé¿¡°Ô Áּ̰í(¸¶Å 28£º18~20), »çµµ´ÜÀÇ ´ÜÀåÀÌ¿ä ÃÖ°í ¸ñÀÚÀÎ(¿äÇÑ 21£º15~17) ½Ã¸ó º£µå·Î¿¡°Ô´Â ±× ÇüÁ¦ÀÎ ¸ðµç »çµµµéÀ» ½Å¾Ó ¾È¿¡¼­ °ß°íÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ÀÓ¹«±îÁö ¸Ã°å´Ù(·ç°¡ 22£º32). µû¶ó¼­ ±³È¸ ¾È¿¡¼­ ÁÖ±³Á÷À» °è½ÂÇÏ´Â ÁÖ±³µé°ú ±³È²Àº ±×¸®½ºµµ²²¼­ »çµµ´Ü¿¡°Ô Áֽб³µµ±ÇÀ» À̾î¹Þ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ±³µµ±ÇÀº ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ¸»¾¸¿¡ ºÀ»çÇϰí, ÀüÇØÁø °Í¸¸À» °¡¸£Ä¡°í, ±×°ÍÀ» °Å·èÈ÷ º¸Á¸ÇÏ°í ¼º½ÇÈ÷ Áø¼úÇÏ´Â ±ÇÇÑÀÌ´Ù.

2) Organs of teaching authority.

±³µµ±ÇÀÇ Çà»ç±â°ü

The teaching authority is not vested in the whole church but in certain well-defined organs. These organs are the hierarchy--the pope and the bishops. The Roman Catholic Church traditionally has divided the church into "the teaching church" and "the listening church." Clergy below the hierarchical level are included in "the listening church," even though they are the assistants of the bishops in the teaching office. The hierarchy alone teaches what the Roman Catholic Church calls "authentic" doctrine. There is an unresolved antithesis between this idea and the traditional belief that "the consent of the faithful" is a source of authentic doctrine; the conventional resolution that defines the consent as formed under the direction of the pastors of the faithful resolves the problem by depriving the consent of the faithful of any meaning.

The Roman pontiff is vested with the entire teaching authority of the Roman Catholic Church; this was solemnly declared in the first Vatican Council. This means that he is the only spokesman for the entire Roman Church; the papacy carries in itself the power to act as supreme pastor. It is expected that he will assure himself that he expresses the existing consensus of the church, but in fact the documents of the first Vatican Council are open to the understanding that the pope may form the consensus by his utterance. The second Vatican Council clarified this ambiguity in the idea of the spokesman of the church by its emphasis on the collegial character of the primacy of the pope. The pope, however, does not always speak as the supreme pastor and head of the Roman Church, and he is expected to make this clear in his utterance.

The bishops are authentic teachers within their dioceses. Thus, the same implicit conflict exists in regard to teaching as was noted in connection with governing. The conflict is resolved by collegiality; that the authentic teacher teaches orthodox doctrine is recognized by comparing his doctrine with that of his episcopal colleagues. In this way doctrinal disputes were resolved in the pre-Constantinian church, and a regional council was called if necessary. Since the Reformation the Roman see has never admitted publicly that a bishop has fallen into doctrinal error; the united front of authentic doctrine is preserved, and the matter is dealt with by subtle means. What is taught by all the bishops is authentic doctrine; it is understood that they teach in communion with the Roman pontiff, and a conflict of doctrine on this level is simply not regarded as a possibility. This consensus of the bishops is known as "the ordinary teaching." "The extraordinary teaching" signifies the solemn declaration of an ecumenical council, which is the assembly of the bishops, or the most solemn type of papal declaration, known as a definition of doctrine ex cathedra ("from the throne"), a term that signifies that the declaration exhibits the marks of the teaching of the supreme pastor addressed to the universal church. (see also Index: ex cathedra declaration)

±³µµ±ÇÀº ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ´ÜÀÇ ±³µµ±Ç°ú Æò½Åµµ´ÜÀÇ ±³µµ±ÇÀ¸·Î ±¸ºÐµÇ°í, ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ´ÜÀÇ ±³µµ±ÇÀº ´Ù½Ã ±× Çà»ç»ó Àå¾ö±³µµ±Ç°ú Åë»ó±³µµ±ÇÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾îÁø´Ù. ÀüÀÚ´Â ±³È²ÀÌ ±³Á¿¡¼­ ¼±¾ðÇϰųª, ÁÖ±³´ÜÀÌ °øÀÇȸ¿¡ ¸ð¿© ¼±¾ðÇÒ °æ¿ì¿¡ ¼º¸³µÈ´Ù. ÈÄÀÚ´Â ÁÖ±³µéÀÌ ±ÇÇÑÀ» °®°í ¹ßÇ¥ÇÏ´Â ÀϹݱ³½Ã¸¦ ¸»Çϴµ¥, À̴ ȸĢ Çü½ÄÀ̳ª Áö¿ª ÁÖ±³´ÜÀÇ °øµ¿±³¼­ Çü½ÄÀ¸·Î ¹ßÇ¥µÈ´Ù. Æò½Åµµ´ÜÀÇ ±³µµ±ÇÀº Æò½Åµµ°¡ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ´ÜÀÇ ±³µµ±ÇÀ» ÅëÇÑ °¡¸£Ä§À» ¹Þ¾Æµé¿© À̸¦ ¼¼¼Ó¹®È­¿¡ ÀûÀÀ½ÃŰ°í ±íÀÌ ÀÌÇØÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ±× Áø¸®¸¦ ¿ËÈ£ÇÏ°í ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â µ¥ °øÇåÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ ¼øÁ¾ÀÇ µ¿±â´Â ±³È²À̳ª ÁÖ±³µéÀÇ Àΰ£Àû Áö½ÄÀ̳ª ÁöÇý¿¡ ÀÖ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ±×¸®½ºµµ°¡ ±³È²°ú ÁÖ±³µéÀ» ÅëÇØ ±³È¸¸¦ ÁöµµÇϰí Áö¹èÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù´Â È®½Å¿¡ ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¼º·ÉÀÌ ÁÖ±³µé·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ¿À·ù¾øÀÌ °¡¸£Ä¡µµ·Ï µµ¿ÍÁÖµíÀÌ, Æò½ÅµµµéÀÌ ¿À·ù¸¦ ¹ÏÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï µµ¿ÍÁØ´Ù°í ¹Ï°í ÀÖ´Ù.

±³µµ±ÇÀº Àüü ±³È¸¿¡ ºÎ¿©µÇ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó È®½ÇÇÏ°Ô Á¤ÀÇµÈ ±â°üµé¿¡ ºÎ¿©µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ ±â°üµéÀº °íÀ§ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ °è±ÞÀÎ ±³È²°ú ÁÖ±³µéÀÌ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ÀüÅëÀûÀ¸·Î ±³È¸¸¦ '°¡¸£Ä¡´Â ±³È¸'¿Í 'µè´Â ±³È¸'·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. °íÀ§ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ °è±Þ ÀÌÇÏÀÇ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚµéÀº 'µè´Â ±³È¸'¿¡ Æ÷ÇԵȴÙ.

·Î¸¶ ±³È²Àº °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ ÀüüÀûÀÎ ±³µµ±ÇÀ» ºÎ¿©¹Þ°í ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ÀÌ Á¡Àº Á¦1Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ¿¡¼­ ¾ö¼÷È÷ ¼±¾ðµÇ¾ú´Ù. À̰ÍÀº ±³È²ÀÌ Àüü ·Î¸¶ ±³È¸ÀÇ À¯ÀÏÇÑ ´ëº¯ÀÚÀÓÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ±³È²Àº º»·¡ÀÇ »ç¸ñÀڷμ­ ÇൿÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ±ÇÇÑÀ» °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù.

ÁÖ±³´Â ±³±¸¿¡¼­ Ȱµ¿ÇÏ´Â ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ ±³»çÀÌ´Ù. µû¶ó¼­ ±³È¸¸¦ ´Ù½º¸®´Â °Í°ú ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î °¡¸£Ä§¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­µµ ³»ÀçÀûÀÎ °¥µîÀÌ Á¸ÀçÇÑ´Ù.

¡¡

3) Object and response.

The object of authentic teaching is defined as "faith and morals." Faith means revealed truth. Morals theoretically means revealed moral principles, but it has long been understood as moral judgment in any area of human conduct; thus, the Roman Catholic Church not only prohibits contraception for its members, but by declaring it contrary to "the natural law" the church declares contraception to be universally wrong. Thus, morals includes the declaration and interpretation of the natural law. The limits of faith and morals have never been defined by the Roman Catholic Church, nor can one take the exercise of the teaching authority as a reliable guide. Thus the teaching authority condemned the heliocentric theory of Galileo as contrary to the Bible because it has always understood that revealed truth involves propositions that are not themselves revealed but that must be affirmed or denied, at least in the present context of knowledge, because of revealed doctrine. (see also Index: morality)

Dogma is the name given to a proposition that is proclaimed with all possible solemnity either by the Roman pontiff or by an ecumenical council. A dogma is a revealed truth that the Roman Catholic Church solemnly declares to be true and to be revealed; it is most properly the object of faith. (see also Index: revelation)

The first Vatican Council declared that the pope, when he teaches solemnly and in the area of faith and morals as the supreme universal pastor, teaches infallibly with that infallibility that the church has. The infallibility of the church has never been defined, and its extent is understood by theologians in the sense of pontifical infallibility as limited to faith and morals. These terms are ambiguous, as noted above. Infallibility is actually hedged in with many reservations; nevertheless, pontifical documents often have an aggressive tone that may mislead the incautious reader. The real problem is how a teaching authority that can and does make errors in doctrinal teaching can be called infallible, even with numerous and serious reservations. In the early 1970s some Catholic theologians (e.g., Hans Küng) suggested that the church should be understood as indefectible (i.e., not able to fail or be totally led astray) rather than infallible. (see also Index: papal infallibility)

The proper response of the Roman Catholic to authoritative teaching that is "ordinary" and does not clearly deal with "faith or morals" is religious assent. This is extremely difficult to define; it admits dissent under poorly defined conditions. But the theory of religious assent does in fact permit the considerable dissent from the authoritative teaching of Paul VI in 1968 against contraception. Religious assent is particularly relevant to the pontifical document called the encyclical, a type of document that first appeared in the 18th century and became the normal mode of pontifical communication in the 19th century. The encyclical letter is a channel of ordinary teaching, not solemn and definitive and somewhat provisional by definition. Religious assent may be withheld, in popular language, by anyone who in good conscience thinks he knows better. The traditional discipline has made Roman Catholics slow to say this; in modern times they say it more quickly. At the same time, the documents of the second Vatican Council indicate that the authoritative teaching body will be slower to assert itself in the future.

¡¡

5. MAJOR DOGMAS AND DOCTRINES

ÁÖ¿ä ±³ÀÇ¿Í ±³¸®

The Roman Catholic Church in its formula of baptism still asks candidates to recite the Apostles' Creed as a sign that they believe what they must believe. The early Church Fathers made the creed the basis of the baptismal homilies given to catechumens, those preparing for the rite. The homilies, like modern Roman Catholic doctrine, went considerably beyond the bare articles of the creed.

Roman Catholic faith incorporates into its structure the books of the Old Testament.From these books it derives its belief in original sin, conceived as a hereditary and universal moral defect that makes human beings incapable of achieving their destiny and even of achieving basic human decency. The importance of this doctrine lies in its explanation of the human condition as caused by the failure of man and not by the failure of God (nor, in modern Roman Catholic theology, by diabolical influence). Man can be delivered from the human condition only by a saving act of God. This act is accomplished by God in the death and Resurrection of Jesus. In Jesus, God is revealed as the Father who sends the Son on his saving mission, and through the Son the Spirit comes to dwell in the redeemed. Thus the Trinity of Persons is revealed, and the destiny of man is to share the divine life of the three Persons. The saving act of Jesus introduces into the world grace, a theological idea that has been much and hotly disputed. Grace signifies in Roman Catholic belief both the love of God and the effect produced in man by this love. The response of believers to the presence of grace is the three theological virtues of faith, hope, and charity; these enable them to live the Christian life. Human beings are introduced to grace and initiated into the church by baptism, which must be preceded by repentance and faith. The life of grace is sustained in the church by the sacraments.

The life of grace reaches its fulfillment in eschatology; in this area of belief about the end of the world and "the last things," there is some uncertainty in modern theology. Most theologians recognize the mythological character of most of the imagery of heaven, hell, and purgatory. The peculiarly Roman Catholic belief in purgatory was an effort to state that most men at death are neither good enough for heaven nor bad enough for hell. The theology of the last things is still unable to cope with the implications of this statement. Belief in a resurrection to eternal life has never been easy, and modern times have produced more difficulties than solutions. Christianity, in fact, shows oscillation between a transcendental direction and an immanent direction; in modern times the emphasis is on immanence--that is, on the meaning of religion in the world. The second Vatican Council reflected this in its statements on the "secular" and the response of the church to the secular.

This summary can state no more than the basic elements of the Christian fact. The complex Roman Catholic dogmatic structure has been mentioned several times, and probably no two statements of "major dogmas and doctrines" would be the same.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¼¼·Ê ¿¹½Ä¼­¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿µ¼¼ Èĺ¸ÀÚµéÀÌ ¹Ï¾î¾ß ÇÒ ±³¸®¸¦ ¹Ï´Â´Ù´Â Ç¥½Ã·Î »çµµ½Å°æÀ» ¾Ï¼ÛÇÒ °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù. Ãʱⱳȸ ±³ºÎµéÀº ÀÌ »çµµ½Å°æÀ» ±âÃÊ·Î ¼¼·Ê ÁغñÀڵ鿡°Ô ¼¼·Ê °­·Ð(¼³±³)À» Çß´Ù. ÀÌ °­·ÐÀº Çö´ë ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³¸®µé°ú ¸¶Âù°¡Áö·Î ¹«¹Ì°ÇÁ¶ÇÑ ½ÅÁ¶µéº¸´Ù ÈξÀ dzºÎÇÑ ³»¿ëÀ» °¡Á³´Ù.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½Å¾ÓÀº ½Å¾ÓÀÇ ±¸Á¶ ¼Ó¿¡ ¡´±¸¾à¼º¼­¡µ¸¦ ÅëÇÕ½Ã۰í ÀÖ´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ ¡´±¸¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡¼­ ¿øÁË¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½ÅÁ¶¸¦ ²ø¾î³»°í ÀÖ´Ù. ¿øÁË´Â Àΰ£À¸·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ÇÏ´ÃÀÇ ¶æÀ» ¼ºÃëÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏ°Ô Çϰí, Àΰ£ÀÇ ±âº»ÀûÀΠǰÀ§¸¶Àúµµ ÀÌ·çÁö ¸øÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â À¯ÀüÀûÀÌ°í º¸ÆíÀûÀÎ µµ´öÀû °áÇÔÀ¸·Î »ý°¢µÈ´Ù. ÀÌ ±³¸®ÀÇ Á߿伺Àº Àΰ£ÀÇ »óȲÀÌ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ½Ç¼ö°¡ ¾Æ´Ñ(¶Ç´Â Çö´ë °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÌ ¸»ÇϵíÀÌ ¾Ç¸¶ÀÇ ¿µÇâ¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­µµ ¾Æ´Ñ) Àΰ£ÀÇ ½Ç¼ö¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¾ß±âµÇ¾ú´Ù°í ¼³¸íÇÏ´Â µ¥ ÀÖ´Ù. Àΰ£Àº ¿ÀÁ÷ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ±¸¿øÇàÀ§¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼­¸¸ ±×·¯ÇÑ Àΰ£»óȲÀ¸·ÎºÎÅÍ ±¸¿ø¹ÞÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ ±¸¿øÇàÀ§´Â ¿¹¼öÀÇ Á×À½°ú ºÎȰÀ» ÅëÇØ ÇÏ´À´Ô¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ¼ºÃëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿¹¼ö ¾È¿¡¼­ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀº ¼ºÀÚ(á¡í­)¿¡°Ô ±¸¿ø »ç¸íÀ» ÁÖ¾î ÆÄ°ßÇÏ´Â ¼ººÎ(á¡Ý«)·Î¼­ °è½ÃµÇ¸ç, ¼ºÀÚ¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¼º·ÉÀº ±¸¿ø¹ÞÀº Àΰ£µé °¡¿îµ¥ ÀÓÀçÇÑ´Ù. À§°Ý(êÈÌ«)ÀÇ 3À§ÀÏü´Â ÀÌ·¸°Ô °è½ÃµÇ¸ç, Àΰ£ÀÇ ¿î¸íÀº 3À§°ÝÀÇ ½ÅÀûÀÎ »îÀ» °øÀ¯ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

¿¹¼öÀÇ ±¸¿øÇàÀ§´Â ¼¼»ó¿¡ ÀºÃÑÀ» °¡Á®¿À´Âµ¥, ÀÌ ÀºÃÑÀº ¿©·¯ Â÷·Ê °Ý·ÄÇÏ°Ô ³í¶õµÈ ½ÅÇÐÀû °ü³äÀÌ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½Å¾Ó¿¡¼­ ÀºÃÑÀº ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ »ç¶ûÀ» ÀǹÌÇÏ´Â µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÌ »ç¶ûÀ¸·Î ÀÎÇØ Àΰ£ ¾È¿¡¼­ »ý±â´Â °á°úµµ ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. ÀºÃÑÀÇ ÇöÁ¸¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å¾ÓÀεéÀÇ ÀÀ´äÀº ¹ÏÀ½¡¤Èñ¸Á¡¤»ç¶ûÀÇ 3°¡Áö ½ÅÇÐÀû ´ö¸ñÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ 3°¡Áö ´ö¸ñÀº ½ÅÀÚµé·Î ÇÏ¿©±Ý ±×¸®½ºµµÀÎÀÇ »îÀ» ¿µÀ§ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ°Ô ÇØÁØ´Ù. Àΰ£Àº ¼¼·Ê·Î ÀÎÇØ ÀºÃÑÀ» ¹Þ°í ±³È¸¿¡ ³ª¿À°Ô µÇ´Âµ¥, ȸ°³¿Í ¹ÏÀ½ÀÌ ¼¼·Êº¸´Ù ¼±ÇàµÇ¾î¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ÀºÃÑÀÇ »îÀº ¼º»ç(á¡ÞÀ)¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±³È¸ ¾È¿¡¼­ Áö¼ÓµÈ´Ù.

¡¡

6. THE LITURGY

Àü·Ê

Cultic worship is so universal in religion that some historians of religion define religion as cult. Cultic worship is social, and this means more than a group worshiping the same deity in the same place at the same time. Cult is structured with a division of sacred personnel (priests) who lead and perform the cultic ceremonies for the people, who are in a more distant relation with the deity. The sacred personnel are designated by the choice and acceptance both of the deity and of the worshiping group. The words and actions of the cultic performance are divided into roles assigned to the leaders and to the worshipers. It is the tendency of cultic worship to replace spontaneity, which it once had, with set and even rigid forms of words and acts. These are preserved by tradition, and they generally have a sacredness that is based on the belief that the directions for cultic worship came ultimately from the deity.

¡¡

1) The eucharistic assembly or mass.

¼ºÂùÀÇ Àü·Ê ¶Ç´Â ¹Ì»ç

Roman Catholic liturgy has its roots in Judaism and the New Testament. The central act of liturgy from earliest times was the eucharistic assembly, the commemorative celebration of the Last Supper of Jesus. This was set in a structure of liturgical prayer. The first six centuries of the Christian Church saw the development of a rich variety of liturgical systems, many of which have survived in the Oriental churches. In the West the Latin liturgy appeared fully developed in Rome in the 6th and 7th centuries. From the 8th century the Roman liturgy was adopted throughout western Europe. In this same period, however, liturgy developed in Frankish territories; and the Roman rite that emerged as dominant in the 10th century was a Roman-Frankish creation. The Roman rite was reformed by the Council of Trent by the removal of some corruptions and the imposition of uniformity; after Trent the Roman see was the supreme authority over liturgical practice in the entire Roman Catholic Church.

By the 11th century Roman liturgy had acquired the classic form that it retained up to the second Vatican Council. The fullness of the liturgy could be witnessed only in some cathedrals, collegiate churches, and monastic churches. The full liturgy included the daily celebration of the solemn high mass and recitation of the divine office in choir. The solemn high mass was performed by at least three major officers (celebrant, deacon, and subdeacon), assisted by many acolytes and ministers. Except during the penitential seasons of Advent and Lent, the altar was decorated, and numerous candles (in the Middle Ages for light rather than ornamentation) and incense were employed. The singing and chanting were accompanied by the organ and in modern times even by orchestral music; Mozart once complained that the Archbishop of Salzburg compelled him to compose a mass without the resources of a full symphonic orchestra.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯ÀÇ Àü·Ê´Â À¯´ë±³¿Í ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡ ±× ±â¿øÀ» µÎ°í ÀÖ´Ù. ÃʱâºÎÅÍ Àü·ÊÀÇ Áß½ÉÀû ÇàÀ§´Â ¼ºÂùÀÇ Àü·Ê, Áï ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ÃÖÈĸ¸ÂùÀ» ±â³äÇÏ´Â ¿¹½ÄÀ̾ú´Ù. À̰ÍÀº Àü·Ê±âµµÀÇ ±¸Á¶·Î °íÁ¤µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×¸®½ºµµ ±³È¸°¡ ¼º¸³µÈ ÈÄ 6¼¼±â µ¿¾È ¸Å¿ì ´Ù¾çÇÑ Àü·ÊÁ¦µµ°¡ ¹ßÀüµÇ¾ú´Âµ¥, ±× °¡¿îµ¥ ¸¹Àº Á¦µµ°¡ µ¿¹æ±³È¸ÀÇ Àü·Ê ¼Ó¿¡ ³²¾Æ ÀÖ´Ù.

11¼¼±â¿¡ Àü·Ê´Â °íÀüÀûÀÎ Çü½ÄÀ» °®Ãß°Ô µÇ¾î Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ±îÁö À¯ÁöµÇ¾ú´Ù. ¿ÏÀüÇÑ Àü·Ê´Â ¸ÅÀÏ °ÅÇàÇÏ´Â Àå¾ö(¾ö¼÷) ´ë¹Ì»ç¿Í ¼º°¡´ë°¡ ¹ÙÄ¡´Â ¼º¹«ÀϵµÀÇ ³¶¼ÛÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇß´Ù. Àå¾ö ´ë¹Ì»ç´Â ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ 3¸íÀÇ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ(ÁÖ·ÊÀÚ, ºÎÁ¦, Â÷ºÎÁ¦)°¡ ÁýÀüÇÏ¿´°í, À̵éÀº ¸¹Àº ½ÃÁ¦(ã´ð®)¿Í º¹»ç(Ü×ÞÀ)ÀÇ ½ÃÁßÀ» ¹Þ¾Ò´Ù. ´ë¸²Àý(Óâ×üï½)°ú »ç¼øÀýÀÇ Âüȸ½Ã±â ¿Ü¿¡´Â Á¦´ÜÀÌ Àå½ÄµÇ¾úÀ¸¸ç, ¼ö¸¹Àº Ãдë(Áß¼¼½Ã´ë¿¡´Â Àå½Ä¿ëÀ̶ó±âº¸´Ù´Â ¾îµÒÀ» ¹àÈ÷´Â ¿ëµµ·Î »ç¿ëµÇ¾úÀ½)¿Í ÇâÀÌ »ç¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù. ³ë·¡¿Í ¼º°¡´Â ¿À¸£°£ ¹ÝÁÖ¿¡ ¸ÂÃß¾î ºÒ·¶´Âµ¥, ¸ðÂ÷¸£Æ®´Â ÀßÃ÷ºÎ¸£Å©ÀÇ ´ëÁÖ±³°¡ ½ÉÆ÷´Ï ¿ÀÄɽºÆ®¶óµµ Á¦´ë·Î °®Ãß¾î ³õÁö ¾Ê°í ¹Ì»ç°îÀ» ÀÛ°îÇϵµ·Ï °­¿äÇÑ´Ù°í ºÒÆòÇÑ Àϵµ ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

2) The divine office.

¼º¹«Àϵµ(á¡ÙâìíÔª)

The divine office was a legacy to the clergy from the monks. From the beginnings monks assembled several times daily for prayer in common. This developed into set common prayer at stated times each day (Matins, midnight; Lauds, first daylight; Prime, sunrise; Terce, mid-morning; Sext, noon; None, mid-afternoon; Vespers, sunset; Compline, before retiring). The divine office consisted basically of the chanting of the Psalms (in a weekly cycle), the recital of prayers, and the reading of the Scriptures (to which were later added selections from the writings of the Church Fathers, probably instead of a homily given by one of those present). Together with the mass the office has been the only "official" prayer of the Roman Catholic Church; all other prayer forms are "private," even if several hundred people recite them together. For this reason clerics in major orders for centuries since the Middle Ages have been obliged to recite the divine office, or "breviary," privately if they are not bound to attend the office in choir. It was long recognized that there is an inconsistency in the private silent reading of a prayer structure that is intended for choral chanting, and the second Vatican Council recommended a reform, after which time many priests abandoned the breviary.

¡¡

¼º¹«Àϵµ´Â ¼öµµÀڷκÎÅÍ ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚ¿¡°Ô ÀüÇØÁø À¯»êÀ̾ú´Ù. ¼º¹«Àϵµ´Â ±âº»ÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÃÆíÀÇ ³¶¼Û(1ÁÖÀÏ ÁÖ±â·Î ÇÔ), ±âµµ¹® ¾Ï¼Û, ¼º¼­ºÀµ¶(ÈÄ¿¡ ±³ºÎµéÀÇ ÀúÀÛ¿¡¼­ ¹ßÃéÇÑ °ÍÀ» ÷°¡)À¸·Î ±¸¼ºµÈ´Ù. ¹Ì»ç¿Í ÇÔ²² ¼º¹«Àϵµ´Â ¸ÅÀÏ Á¤ÇØÁø ½Ã°£¿¡ ÇÏ´À´ÔÀ» Âù¹ÌÇÏ´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ '°ø½ÄÀû'±âµµ°¡ µÇ¾î¿Ô´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ ¸ðµç ±âµµ¹® Çü½ÄÀº ºñ·Ï ¼ö¹é ¸íÀÌ ÇÔ²² ¾Ï¼ÛÇÑ´Ù ÇØµµ 'ºñ°ø½ÄÀûÀÎ' ±âµµÀÌ´Ù. »çÁ¦¿Í ºÎÁ¦´Â ¼º¹«Àϵµ¸¦ ¹ÙÄ¥ Àǹ«°¡ ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼ö»çµéÀº ¼öµµÈ¸ÀÇ ±ÔÄ¢¿¡ µû¶ó ¼º¹«Àϵµ¸¦ ¹ÙÄ£´Ù. ±³È¸´Â ÀϹݽÅÀڵ鵵 ¹ÙÄ¥ °ÍÀ» ±ÇÀ¯Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

3) The cycle and the language of the liturgy.

Àü·ÊÀÇ ÁÖ±â¿Í ¾ð¾î

The liturgy has long been arranged in an annual cycle that is a re-enactment of the saving events of the life, death, Resurrection, and glorification of Jesus Christ. Even many Catholics do not realize that the cycle has an eschatological outlook; the events are reenacted as an assurance that the saving act will reach its eschatological fullness, and the liturgy is an expression and a support of the Christian hope. The cult of the saints is an intrusion into the liturgical cycle, and it has been much reduced in the contemporary liturgical reforms.

Latin did not become the language of the Roman rite until the 6th century; the language of imperial Rome was Greek. As a sacred language Latin really has no parallel. Jews have always made a genuine effort to learn some Hebrew, and other sacred languages are archaic forms of the vernacular; the English of the Authorized Version of the Bible became the language of prayer in many Protestant churches. The effect of Latin was to make the liturgy the preserve of the clergy, and the laity became purely passive. This was countered by the efforts to use sound and spectacle in the performance of the solemn liturgy. The Canon of the mass, the central eucharistic formula, for centuries was recited by the celebrant inaudibly; this was a kind of verbal "sanctuary" that the laity were not even supposed to hear. The abandonment of Latin as a result of the second Vatican Council excited deep antagonisms; one sees in the Latin liturgy an image, cherished by many, of the timeless and changeless Roman Catholic Church. Yet the restoration of the vernacular should restore to the liturgy two functions that it had in the early centuries: to instruct converts and to confirm members in their faith.

¡¡

Àü·Ê´Â ¿À·¡ÀüºÎÅÍ 1³â ÁÖ±â·Î ¹è¿­µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Âµ¥, ÀÌ Àü·ÊÁÖ±â´Â ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ »î°ú Á×À½, ºÎȰ, ¿µÈ­(ç´ûù)ÀÇ ±¸¿ø»ç°ÇÀ» À翬ÇÑ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ ±¸¿ø»ç°ÇÀº ±¸¿ø ÇàÀ§°¡ Á¾¸»·ÐÀû ¿Ï¼º¿¡ µµ´ÞÇÒ °ÍÀÓÀ» º¸¿©ÁÖ´Â º¸ÁõÀ¸·Î½á À翬µÈ´Ù. Àü·Ê´Â ±×¸®½ºµµ±³Àû Èñ¸ÁÀÇ Ç¥ÇöÀÎ µ¿½Ã¿¡ È®ÁõÀ̶ó°í ÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù.

¶óƾ¾î´Â 6¼¼±â ÀÌÀü±îÁö´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ Àü·Ê ¿ë¾î°¡ ¾Æ´Ï¾ú´Ù. ¶óƾ¾îÀÇ ¿µÇâÀ¸·Î Àü·Ê´Â ¼ºÁ÷ÀÚÀÇ ¿µ¿ªÀÌ µÇ¾ú°í, Æò½Åµµ´Â ¼øÀüÈ÷ ¼öµ¿ÀûÀÎ ÀÔÀåÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸÀÇ °á°ú, ¶óƾ¾î »ç¿ëÀÌ ÆóÁöµÇÀÚ ±³È¸ ³»¿¡¼­ ½ÉÇÑ ¹Ý´ë°¡ ÀϾ´Ù. ±×°ÍÀº »ç¶÷µéÀÌ ¶óƾ¾î Àü·Ê¿¡¼­ ¸¹Àº »ç¶÷µéÀÇ °¡½¿ ¼Ó¿¡ °£Á÷µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Â ¿µ¿øÇÑ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ Ç¥»óÀ» º¸¾Ò±â ¶§¹®ÀÏ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×·³¿¡µµ ºÒ±¸ÇÏ°í ¸ð±¹¾î Àü·ÊÀÇ º¹¿øÀº óÀ½ ¼ö¼¼±â µ¿¾È¿¡ Àü·Ê°¡ Áö³æ´ø 2°¡Áö ±â´É, Áï °³Á¾ÀÚ¸¦ °¡¸£Ä¡°í ½ÅÀÚµéÀÇ ½Å¾ÓÀ» È®°íÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ±â´ÉÀ» ȸº¹½ÃŰ´Â µ¥ Å« µµ¿òÀ» ÁÖ¾úÀ» °ÍÀ¸·Î º¸ÀδÙ.

¡¡

7. THE SACRAMENTS

¼º»ç(á¡ÞÀ Sacrament)

1) The sacraments in general.

¼º»çÀÇ °³°ü(ËÈκ)

In Roman Catholic theology a sacrament is an outward sign, instituted by Jesus Christ, that is productive of inner grace. The number of sacraments is seven (defined by the Council of Trent against the Reformers, who reduced the number). The number seven does not appear in Roman Catholic teaching before the 11th century, and it is an example of truth for which the Roman Catholic Church relies on its own tradition.

The sacrament in modern theology is frequently described as an encounter with mystery, the mystery being the saving act of God in Christ. Theological studies have been directed to the exploration of the idea of sign and significance. The traditional Roman Catholic statement of the effectiveness of the sacraments (defined by the Council of Trent) is described by the untranslatable ex opere operato, which is best explained briefly by saying that the faith and virtue of the minister neither add to the sacrament by their presence nor detract from it by their absence. The minister is merely the agent of the church, and the effectiveness of the sacrament is based on the saving act of God in Christ, which is signified by the rite and applied to the recipient of the sacrament.

Protestant theologians formerly charged the Roman Catholic Church with a belief in magic; this controversial angle has generally been abandoned, but the theological explanation of the sign that effects by signifying is still difficult. Roman Catholic theologians remark that the mystery of God's saving act is not capable of complete rational explanation. There are analogies, however, in common experience, and there is no society that does not employ effective signs. These signs are not merely for display. The inauguration of the president of the United States makes the man president; the sign is effective because it signifies the reality of the election that this individual won. The sign of the coronation of a monarch is equally effective, but it is more difficult to define the reality signified. Such effective symbols are a part of human society.

The Roman Catholic Church adheres strictly to the external sign. Traditionally the church attributes the institution of the sign to Jesus Christ (although this has been the subject of discussion among modern theologians), and this removes the right of anyone to tamper with it. The Roman Catholic Church believes that, if God gave a sign, the alteration of the sign so that the significance is lost might render the sign ineffective. Hence, the use of the proper material and the retention of the traditional formula are treated as sacred. The Roman Catholic Church maintains its exclusive competence to supervise matter and form "in detail," a competence not precisely defined. Since Thomas Aquinas the material used is called matter, and the words are called form; the terms are borrowed from the Aristotelian theory of the constitution of matter. The material becomes sacred and salutary only by its conjunction with the proper words. The effect produced has for centuries been called grace, but it is difficult to assert a single effect and still explain why there are seven symbols.

The term sacramental is used to designate verbal formulas (such as blessings) or objects (such as holy water or medals) to which a religious significance has been attached. These are symbols of personal prayer and dedication, and their effectiveness is measured by the particular dispositions of the person who uses them. Although superstition has arisen in connection with sacramentals, the Roman Catholic with elementary instruction knows the difference between them.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇп¡¼­ Àü·Ê´Â ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµ°¡ Á¦Á¤ÇÑ °ÍÀ¸·Î ³»Àû ÀºÃÑÀ» °¡Á®¿À´Â ¿ÜÀûÀΠǥ¡ÀÌ´Ù. Àü·Ê´Â °¡Å縯 ±³È¸°¡ ¼º¼­¿Í ¼ºÀü¿¡ ÀǰÅÇÏ¿© Á¤½ÄÀ¸·Î °øÀÎÇÑ ÀǽÄÀ¸·Î °³ÀÎÀÇ ½Å¾Ó»ýȰ°ú ±¸º°µÈ´Ù. Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ´Â "Àü·Ê¸¦ ÅëÇØ ¿ì¸® ¼ÓÁËÀÇ ±¸¿ø»ç¾÷ÀÌ ¼öÇàµÈ´Ù. ±×·¯¹Ç·Î ½ÅÀÚµéÀÌ ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ½Åºñ¿Í ÂüµÈ ±³È¸ÀÇ º»ÁúÀ» ´Ù¸¥ ÀÌ¿¡°Ô µå·¯³» º¸ÀÌ°í ¸í½ÃÇÏ´Â µ¥ °¡Àå Å« µµ¿ò"ÀÌ µÈ´Ù°í °­Á¶ÇÑ´Ù. ¿©±â¼­ Àü·Ê´Â ÇÏ´À´Ô°ú ±¸¿øµÉ Àΰ£ÀÇ °áÇÕÀ̸ç, ²÷ÀÓ¾ø´Â ¸¸³²À̶ó´Â Àǹ̰¡ °­ÇÏ°Ô Ç¥ÇöµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. Àü·Ê¿¡¼­ Áß½ÉÀû À§Ä¡¸¦ Â÷ÁöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ ¹Ì»ç¿Í ¼º»çÀÌ´Ù. ¼º»çÀÇ ¼ö´Â 7°¡Áö·Î¼­ 7´ë¼º»ç¶ó°í ºÎ¸¥´Ù(ÀÌ ¼ö´Â Æ®¸®¿£Æ® °øÀÇȸ°¡ ¼º»çÀÇ ¼ö¸¦ ÁÙÀÎ Á¾±³°³ÇõÀڵ鿡 ´ëÇ×Çϱâ À§ÇØ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÑ °Í). Çö´ë½ÅÇп¡¼­ ¼º»ç´Â ÈçÈ÷ '½Åºñ¿ÍÀÇ ¸¸³²'À̶ó´Â ¸»·Î Ç¥ÇöµÇ´Âµ¥, ÀÌ ½Åºñ´Â ±×¸®½ºµµ ¾È¿¡¼­ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Â ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÇ ±¸¿øÇàÀ§ÀÌ´Ù.

¡¡

2) Baptism

¼º¼¼¼º»ç

Baptism is the sacrament of regeneration and initiation into the church. According to a theme of St. Paul, probably influenced by Jewish belief in the circumcision of adult proselytes, baptism is death to a former life and the emergence of a new person, signified by the conferring of a new name; it is the total annulment of the sins of one's past and the emergence of a totally innocent person. One becomes a member of the church and is incorporated into the body of Christ, thus becoming empowered to lead the life of Christ. Nothing but pure natural water may be used, and baptism must be conferred in the name of the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Baptism is normally conferred by a priest, but the Roman Catholic Church accepts the baptism conferred by anyone having the use of reason "with the intention of doing what the church does." As the sacrament of rebirth it cannot be repeated. The Roman Catholic Church baptizes conditionally in case of doubt of the fact of baptism or the use of the proper rite.

Two points of controversy still exist in modern times. One is baptism by pouring rather than immersion, even though immersion was probably the biblical and early Christian rite. The change was almost certainly the result of the spread of Christianity into Europe north of the Alps and the occurrence of the baptismal feasts, Easter and Pentecost, often in early spring. The Roman Catholic Church simply asserts that the symbolism of the bath is preserved by a ritual infusion of water.

The second is the baptism of infants. There is no certain evidence of this earlier than the 3rd century, and the ancient baptismal liturgies are all intended for adults. The liturgy and the instructions clearly understand the acceptance of baptism as an independent adult decision; without this decision the sacrament cannot be received. The Roman Catholic Church accepts this principle by introducing adults (sponsors, godparents), who make the decision for the infant at the commission of the parents. In Roman law as in modern law, adults are empowered to make decisions for minors. It is expected that the children will accept the decision made for them and will thus supply the adult decision that was presumed.

Until the recent liturgical renewal baptism did not have the religious and ceremonial importance that it had in the early church; the ceremonies were intended to make the adult aware that he had made the most important decision of his life, and the whole church witnessed the ceremony, performed only twice a year on a group of catechumens. Doubtless the baptism of infants contributed to this loss of ceremonialism and to a corresponding lower esteem of baptism.

¡¡

¼º¼¼ ¶Ç´Â ¼¼·Ê´Â ½Å¾Ó ¾È¿¡¼­ ´Ù½Ã ž ±³È¸ÀÇ ÀÏ¿øÀÌ µÇ´Â ¼º»çÀÌ´Ù. À¯´ëÀÎÀÇ ¼ºÀÎ °³Á¾ÀÚ ÇÒ·Ê ½Å¾Ó¿¡¼­ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÞÀº µíÀÌ º¸ÀÌ´Â »çµµ ¹Ù¿ï·ÎÀÇ ³íÁö¿¡ µû¸£¸é, ¼¼·Ê´Â °ú°ÅÀÇ »îÀ» ¸¶°¨ÇÏ°í »õ À̸§À» ¹Þ´Â ¿¹½Ä¿¡¼­ µå·¯³ªµí ÇϳªÀÇ »õ·Î¿î Àΰ£À¸·Î ž´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼¼·Ê´Â °ú°ÅÀÇ Á˸¦ ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î Æó±âÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ̸ç, ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î ¼ø°áÇÑ Àΰ£À¸·Î ÃâÇöÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ±×´Â ±³È¸ÀÇ ÀÏ¿øÀÌ µÇ¸ç ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ¸ö°ú ÇÕÃÄÁüÀ¸·Î½á ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ »ý¸íÀ» ºÎ¿©¹Þ°Ô µÈ´Ù. ¼ø¼öÇÑ ÀÚ¿¬¼ö ¿Ü¿¡´Â ¾Æ¹« °Íµµ ¼¼·Ê¿¡ »ç¿ëµÉ ¼ö ¾øÀ¸¸ç, ¼¼·Ê´Â ¹Ýµå½Ã ¼ººÎ¿Í ¼ºÀÚ¿Í ¼º·ÉÀÇ À̸§À¸·Î º£Ç®¾îÁ®¾ß ÇÑ´Ù. ¼¼·Ê´Â Åë»óÀûÀ¸·Î »çÁ¦µéÀÌ ÁýÇàÇÑ´Ù. ¼¼·Ê´Â žÀÇ ¼º»çÀ̹ǷΠ¹Ýº¹µÉ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù.

¡¡

3) Confirmation

°ßÁø¼º»ç

Confirmation since the 11th century has been conferred by the bishop through the anointing with oil and the imposition of hands; the words are a declaration that the Holy Spirit is conferred. This is an echo of the accounts in the Acts of the Apostles (chapters 8 and 19) in which a distinction is made between baptism and the conferring of the Spirit. In Acts, however, the reception of the Spirit meant the reception and the manifestation of charismatic gifts (e.g., prophecy, speaking with tongues, ecstasy); something else is now meant. Confirmation is normally conferred at or near the beginning of adolescence. The modern liturgical renewal has empowered pastors of parishes to confer confirmation.

Neglect of the theology of confirmation has left some ambiguities. The Oriental churches confer it on infants as a part of the initiation rites of baptism. The postponement of confirmation has led many Roman Catholic theologians to interpret it as a rite of passage from childhood, like the Jewish Bar Mitzvah ceremony; such rites of passage are common in tribal cultures. Early Christian baptism, however, was conferred on adults; thus the catechumenate was the period of "immaturity." It seems that there should be a return to the theology of the Spirit and a consideration of confirmation as the sacrament that empowers the Christian to take an active part in the church. The traditional Roman Catholic view of the laity as passive has contributed to the neglect of the theology of confirmation; it left no room for a charismatic laity.

¡¡

¼º¼¼¼º»ç¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ½ÅÀÚ¿¡°Ô ¼º·É°ú ±× ¼±¹°À» ÁÖ¾î ½Å¾ÓÀ» ¼º¼÷½Ã۰í Áõ°ÅÇÏ°Ô ÇÏ¿© ±³È¸ÀÇ ¿ÏÀüÇÑ ±¸¼º¿øÀÌ µÇ°Ô ÇÏ´Â ¼º»çÀÌ´Ù. °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¼º¼­¿¡¼­ °ßÁø¼º»ç¸¦ ÁýÇàÇÑ »ç·Ê·Î, º£µå·Î¿Í ¿äÇÑÀÌ »ç¸¶¸®¾Æ¿¡¼­(»çµµ 8£º14¡¤17), ¹Ù¿ï·Î°¡ Á÷Á¢ ¼¼·Ê¸¦ ÁØ ÀûÀÌ ¾ø´Â(°í¸° 1£º17) ¿¡Æä¼Ò¿¡¼­(»çµµ 19£º1~6) ÀÌ¹Ì ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ¼¼·Ê¸¦ ¹ÞÀº ½ÅÀÚ¿¡°Ô ¾È¼ö¸¦ ÇÏ¿© ¼º·ÉÀ» Ãæ¸¸È÷ ¹Þ°Ô ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á °ßÁø¼º»ç¸¦ ÁýÀüÇÑ »ç½ÇÀ» µé°í ÀÖ´Ù. °ßÁø¼º»ç´Â 11¼¼±â ÀÌ·¡·Î ÁÖ±³°¡ ±â¸§À» ¹Ù¸£°í ¾È¼öÇØÁÖ´Â ¹æ½ÄÀ¸·Î ÁýÇàµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Âµ¥, ÇÑÆí ¼º»ç ÁýÇàÀÚ´Â ¼º·ÉÀÌ ÀÓÇϽŴٴ ¼±¾ðÀ» ÇÑ´Ù.

¡¡

4) The Eucharist.

¼ºÃ¼¼º»ç

The Eucharist (the Lord's Supper, Holy Communion) is with baptism one of the two sacraments most clearly found in the New Testament; most Christian churches have it in some form. The Roman Catholic Church distinguishes the Eucharist as sacrifice (mass) and sacrament (communion).

The formula of institution of the Eucharist and the command to repeat it are found in the three Synoptic Gospels (Matthew, Mark, Luke) and in Paul. Originally the Eucharist was a repetition of the common meal of the local group of disciples with the addition of the bread and the cup symbolizing the presence of Jesus. Even in the 2nd century the meal became vestigial and was finally abandoned. The Eucharist was originally celebrated every Sunday; by the 4th century it was celebrated daily. The eucharistic formula was set in a framework of biblical readings, psalms, hymns, and prayers that depended in form somewhat on the synagogue service. This remained one basis of the various liturgies that arose, including the Roman rite.

The sacrificial character of the Eucharist was determined by its relation to the death of Jesus. The Eucharist is not seen as sacrificial everywhere in the New Testament, but the theme is so clearly elaborated in the Letter to the Hebrews that it is universally accepted as Christian belief. The Protestant churches denied the sacrificial character of the Eucharist and rejected the mass. Roman Catholic theology has never reached a universally accepted theory explaining the connection between the death of Jesus and the mass, but it has firmly insisted that the mass repeats the rite that Jesus told his disciples to repeat and that the rite is an effective symbolic commemoration of his death. The mass is the only act of worship that the Roman Catholic Church imposes upon its members. Historically, the Roman Church has attached great importance to the mass, conceding almost anything to secure its celebration.

Roman Catholicism believes in the Real Presence, and this has dominated Catholic-Protestant controversies about Holy Communion. Protestant belief can generally be called dynamic as contrasted with Catholic realism. The celebrated term transubstantiation is defined as the change of the substance of bread and wine into the substance of the body and blood of Jesus Christ. Protestants believe that Jesus is experienced as present. The Roman Catholic theory is difficult to explain in terms other than those of antiquated Aristotelian physics, and recent theories, not yet successful, have attempted to explore sacramental symbolism in other ways. The realism of belief in the presence is associated with the Roman Catholic practice of distributing only the bread to the laity, a serious modification in the sacramental sign. Not yet universally restored, Holy Communion under both species has become much more common since the second Vatican Council.

Neither in Roman Catholic nor in Protestant eucharistic practice does the sacrament retain much of the symbolism of Christian unity, which it clearly has in the New Testament. Originally the symbolism was that of a community meal, an accepted social symbol of community throughout the whole of human culture. Roman Catholic efforts to restore this have included the use of the vernacular and the active participation of the laity. Furthermore, the ancient rite of concelebration--i.e., several priests or bishops jointly celebrating a single eucharistic liturgy--was restored by the second Vatican Council as a means of symbolizing unity; and the practice of celebrating the Eucharist in an informal setting--i.e., in private homes or classrooms--was instituted in some places as a way of drawing the laity more intimately into the rite. But a great obstacle to the symbolism of unity remains the liturgical isolation of the celebrant and the silence that suited the atmosphere of mystery and the presence of God. (see also Index: ecumenism)

Church law obliges the Roman Catholic to receive Holy Communion once a year (during the Lent-Easter season). Practice of frequency has varied over the centuries; the present law reflects the infrequency that was common in the Middle Ages. The symbolism of the sacrament as nutrition becomes rather feeble with such infrequency; it was rationalized both by the theology of the power of the sacrament and by considerations of the general unworthiness of Christians to receive it.

¡¡

¼ºÂù½Ä(ÁÖÀÇ ¸¸Âù, ¼ºÃ¼¹è·É)Àº ¼º¼¼¼º»ç¿Í ´õºÒ¾î ¡´½Å¾à¼º¼­¡µ¿¡¼­ °¡Àå ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ¹ß°ßµÇ´Â 2°¡Áö ¼º»ç Áß ÇϳªÀÌ´Ù. ´ëºÎºÐÀÇ ±×¸®½ºµµ ±³È¸´Â ¾î¶² ÇüÅ·εç ÀÌ ¼º»ç¸¦ Áö۰í ÀÖ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ÀÌ ¼ºÂù½ÄÀ» Èñ»ýÁ¦»ç(¹Ì»ç)¿Í ¼º»ç(¿µ¼ºÃ¼)·Î ±¸ºÐÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ¼ºÃ¼´Â ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµ°¡ »§°ú Æ÷µµÁÖ ÇüÅ ¾È¿¡ ½Çü·Î ÇöÁ¸ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀ» ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ¼ºÃ¼ÀÇ Á¦ÀüÀº Ãʴ뱳ȸ ¶§ºÎÅÍ ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ ½ÅÀÚ °øµ¿Ã¼ÀÇ Áß½ÉÀ̾ú´Ù. °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â "³ª¸¦ ±â³äÇÏ¿© ÀÌ ¿¹½ÄÀ» ÇàÇ϶ó"(¥°°í¸° 11£º24)´Â ¸»¾¸´ë·Î ¸ÅÀÏ ¹Ì»ç¼ºÃ¼¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÀÌ ¼ºÃ¼Á¦ÀüÀ» °ÅÇàÇÑ´Ù°í ¸»ÇÑ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¹ýÀº ½ÅÀڵ鿡°Ô ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑ 1³â¿¡ 1¹ø(»ç¼øÀý¡¤ºÎȰÀý ±â°£¿¡)Àº ¿µ¼ºÃ¼¸¦ ÇÒ °ÍÀ» Àǹ«È­Çϰí ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

5) Penance

°í¹é(°íÇØ)¼º»ç

The name of the fourth sacrament, penance, reflects the earliest discipline of the penitential rite. Those who sinned seriously were excluded from Holy Communion until they showed repentance by undergoing a period of public penance that included such practices as fasting, public humiliation, the wearing of sackcloth, and other austerities. At the end of the period they were publicly reconciled to the church. There were some sins, called capital (murder, adultery, apostasy), for which certain local churches at certain times did not perform the rite; this did not mean that God did not forgive but that good standing in the church was permanently lost. Elsewhere it was believed that the rite of penance could be performed only once; relapsed sinners lost good standing permanently. Rigorist sects that denied the power to forgive certain sins were regarded as heretical. The penitential rite did not endure beyond the early Middle Ages, and there can be no doubt that it was too rigorous for most Christians. It may also be noticed that the penitential discipline did not reflect the forgiveness of Jesus in the Gospels with all fidelity.

It is impossible to assign an exact date for "auricular confession"--the confessing of faults by an individual penitent to a priest--but it must have arisen in the early Middle Ages with the disappearance of the penitential system. This is the penitential rite that has endured into modern times. It was rejected by most of the Reformers on the ground that God alone can forgive sins. The Roman Catholic Church claims that the absolution of the priest is an act of forgiveness; to receive it the penitent must confess all serious (mortal) sins and manifest genuine "contrition," sorrow for sins, and a reasonably firm purpose of amendment. No quality or quantity of sin is too great for sacramental absolution. Roman Catholic theologians have not arrived at an explanation of the process of absolution. They do not admit that absolution is merely a recognition by the priest of dispositions on the part of the penitent that merit forgiveness nor that it is merely a process whereby the penitent is reconciled with the church. There seems to be an unspoken belief that it is a rare person who is really sorry for his sins and that the sacrament is a manifestation of the graciousness of God to human weakness.

Indulgences, which caused such a stir at the beginning of the Reformation, are neither instant forgiveness to the unrepentant nor licenses of sin to the habitual sinner. They are declarations that the church accepts certain prayers and good works, listed in an official publication, as the equivalent of the rigorous penances of the ancient discipline.

¡¡

4¹øÂ° ¼º»çÀÇ À̸§ÀÎ °íÇØ´Â ±³È¸ ÃʱâÀÇ Âüȸ ÀǽÄÀ» ¹Ý¿µÇϰí ÀÖ´Ù. ´ç½Ã Å« Á˸¦ ÁöÀº »ç¶÷µéÀº °øÀûÀÎ Âüȸ±â°£À» ÅëÇØ ȸ°³ÀÇ Ç¥½Ã¸¦ Çϱâ Àü±îÁö´Â ¼ºÃ¼¸¦ ¹è·ÉÇÒ ¼ö ¾ø¾ú´Âµ¥, °øÀûÀÎ Âüȸ¿¡´Â ±Ý½Ä, ´ëÁß ¾Õ¿¡¼­ÀÇ ±Ý¿åÀûÀÎ ÇàÀ§, ÂüȸÀÇ Ç¥½ÃÀÎ »ïº£¿Ê ÀÔ±â, ´Ù¸¥ ±Ý¿å»ýȰ µîÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵǾî ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. Âüȸ±â°£ÀÌ ³¡³ª¸é ±×µéÀº °øÀûÀ¸·Î ±³È¸¿Í È­ÇØÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. ÁË Áß¿¡´Â ´ëÁ˶ó°í ÇÏ´Â ÁË(»ìÀΡ¤°£À½¡¤¹è±³)°¡ ÀÖ¾ú´Âµ¥, ¾î¶² Áö¿ª±³È¸µéÀº ÇѶ§ ÀÌ ´ëÁË¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â ÂüȸÀǽÄÀ» º£Ç®Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. À̰ÍÀº ÇÏ´À´ÔÀÌ ÀÌ·± Á˸¦ ¿ë¼­ÇϽÃÁö ¾Ê´Â´Ù´Â ¶æÀÌ ¾Æ´Ï¶ó ÀÌ·± Á˸¦ ÁöÀº »ç¶÷Àº ±³È¸¿¡¼­ ¿µ¿øÈ÷ ¼³ ¶¥À» ÀÒ¾ú´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ÀǹÌÇÑ´Ù. Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ ÀÌÈÄ °í¹é¼º»ç´Â ¸¹Àº »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô È­ÇØ¼º»ç·Î ¼ö¿ëµÇ¾ú´Ù.

¡¡

6) The anointing of the sick

º´ÀÚ¼º»ç (º´ÀÚÀÇ µµÀ¯)

This sacrament was long known in English as "extreme unction," literally rendered from its Latin title, unctio extrema. This non-English designation concealed the meaning of the Latin, "last anointing." It is conferred by anointing the sense organs (eyes, ears, nostrils, lips, hands, and formerly the feet and the loins) with blessed oil and the pronunciation of a formula. It may be conferred only on those who are seriously ill; seriousness is measured by the danger of death, but a danger, however certain, from external causes (such as the execution of the death sentence) does not render one apt for the sacrament. It may be administered only once during the same illness; recovery renders one apt again. Its effects are described as strengthening both of soul and body; it is an ancient rite that continues Jesus' ministry of healing. The sacrament is directed against "the remains of sin," an ill-defined phrase; but it was long ago recognized that illness saps one's spiritual resources as well as one's physical strength, and one is not able to meet the crisis of mortal danger with all of one's powers. In popular belief anointing is most valuable as a complement to confession or, in case of unconsciousness, as a substitute for it.

The anointing is not the sacrament of the dying; it is the sacrament of the sick. The New Testament passage (James 5:14-15) to which the Roman Catholic Church appeals for this rite does not envisage a person beyond recovery. Postponement until the patient is critically ill in modern medical terms means that the sacrament is often administered to an unconscious or heavily sedated patient. Under such circumstances the rite can no longer be effective as a sacrament of the sick, and to the uninformed a magical rite of forgiveness is suggested.

¡¡

ÀÌ ¼º»ç´Â Àü·Ê¼­¿¡ ±ÔÁ¤µÈ ±âµµ¹®À» ºÀ¼ÛÇϸ鼭 ¼ºÀ¯(á¡êú)¸¦ º´ÀÚÀÇ °¢ ½Åü±â°ü(´«¡¤±Í¡¤Ä౸¸Û¡¤ÀÔ¼ú¡¤¼Õ, Àü¿¡´Â ¹ß°ú Ç㸮±îÁö¿´À½)¿¡ µµÀ¯(Óóêú)ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ÀÌ ¼º»ç´Â Áߺ´À» ¾Î°í ÀÖ´Â »ç¶÷µé¿¡°Ô¸¸ ÁýÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. µ¿ÀÏÇÑ º´À¸·Î ¾Î°í ÀÖ´Â µ¿¾È¿¡´Â ´ÜÁö 1¹ø¸¸ ÀÌ ¼º»ç¸¦ ¹ÞÀ» ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸³ª, ȸº¹ ÈÄ ´Ù½Ã ¾Î°Ô µÉ °æ¿ì¿¡´Â ¶Ç 1¹ø ÀÌ ¼º»ç¸¦ ¹ÞÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ´Ù. ½Å¾ÓÀûÀ¸·Î º¸¸é º´ÀÚÀÇ µµÀ¯´Â °í¹é¼º»ç¸¦ º¸¿ÏÇϰí, ¼ö·ÉÀÚ°¡ ¹«ÀÇ½Ä »óÅÂÀÏ °æ¿ì °í¹é¼º»ç¸¦ ´ëüÇÏ´Â ¸Å¿ì À¯ÀÍÇÑ ¼º»çÀÌ´Ù.

¡¡

7) Marriage

È¥Àμº»ç

The inclusion of marriage among the sacraments gives the Roman Catholic Church jurisdiction over an institution that is of concern to the state and to non-Catholic persons and groups within society. The Roman Church claims complete jurisdiction over the marriages of its members, even though it is unable to urge this jurisdiction in modern secular states. The sacrament in Roman Catholic teaching is administered by the spouses through the exchange of consent; the priest, whose presence is required, is an authorized official witness; in addition, the church requires two other witnesses. Marriage is safeguarded by a number of impediments that render the marriage null and void whether they are known or not, and the freedom of the spouses must be assured. This means that the Roman Catholic Church demands an unusually rigorous examination before the marriage, and this in turn means that it is practically impossible to marry on impulse in the Catholic Church. All of this is for the purpose of assuring that the marriage so contracted will not be declared null in the future because of some defect. (see also Index: annulment)

The rigid Roman Catholic rejection of divorce has been a major point of hostility in the modern world. Absolute indissolubility is declared only of the marriage of two baptized persons (Protestants as well as Catholics). The same indissolubility is not declared of marriages of the unbaptized, but the Roman Church recognizes no religious or civil authority except itself that is empowered to dissolve such marriages; this claim is extremely limited and is not used unless a Roman Catholic is involved. Because of its rigorous conditions for contracting marriage, the Roman Catholic Church finds grounds for nullity that do not exist in civil law, and it is willing to make a more searching examination. Declarations of nullity, however, should not be confused with divorce nor be thought a substitute for divorce. Some Roman theologians have suggested that Roman Catholic rigour is based on a misunderstanding of the Gospel texts that reject divorce; but a position maintained for centuries is not easily modified.

The onerous conditions that Roman Catholicism formerly imposed upon non-Catholic partners in mixed marriages have been notably relaxed since the second Vatican Council, particularly as regards written promises that the children would receive religious education in the Roman Catholic faith. The former coldness of the Roman Church toward such marriages is also relaxed; they may be celebrated in church during the mass, and a Protestant minister or a Jewish rabbi may share the witness function with the priest.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â È¥ÀÎÀ» ¼º»ç¿¡ Æ÷ÇÔ½ÃÅ´À¸·Î½á ±¹°¡¿Í »çȸ¿¡¼­ ºñ(Þª)°¡Å縯 ½ÅÀÚ³ª ´Üü¿¡°Ôµµ °ü½É»ç°¡ µÇ°í ÀÖ´Â Á¦µµ¿¡ ´ëÇØ °üÇÒ±ÇÀ» Çà»çÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â Çö´ëÀÇ ¼¼¼Ó ±¹°¡ ¾È¿¡¼­ ÀÌ °üÇÒ±ÇÀ» ÁÖÀåÇÏÁö ¸øÇÏÁö¸¸ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ ½ÅÀÚµéÀÇ °áÈ¥¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â ÀüÀûÀÎ °üÇÒ±Ç Çà»ç¸¦ ÁÖÀåÇÑ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ °¡¸£Ä§¿¡ µû¸£¸é, È¥Àμº»ç´Â È¥ÀÎ ´ç»çÀÚµéÀÇ È¥Àμ­¾àÀÇ ±³È¯À¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁø´Ù. »çÁ¦´Â È¥Àο¹½Ä¿¡ ¹Ýµå½Ã Âü¼®ÇÏ¿© ±ÇÇÑÀ» À§ÀÓ¹ÞÀº °øÀûÀÎ ÁõÀÎÀÌ µÈ´Ù. ±³È¸´Â »çÁ¦ À̿ܿ¡ ´Ù¸¥ 2¸íÀÇ ÁõÀεéÀ» ¿ä±¸ÇÑ´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â È¥Àμº»ç¸¦ ÁýÀüÇϱâ Àü¿¡ ´ç»çÀڵ鿡°Ô °áÈ¥¿¡ ´ëÇØ ¸Å¿ì ¾ö¹ÐÇÑ °ËÅ並 ÇÒ °ÍÀ» ¿ä±¸Çϸç, µû¶ó¼­ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¿¡¼­´Â Ãæµ¿¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ °áÈ¥ÀÌ ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î ºÒ°¡´ÉÇÏ´Ù. À̰ÍÀº È¥Àμº»ç°¡ ¾î¶² °áÇÔ ¶§¹®¿¡ ³ªÁß¿¡ ¹«È¿·Î ¼±¾ðµÇÁö ¾Êµµ·Ï ¿Ïº®À» ±âÇϱâ À§ÇÑ Á¶Ä¡ÀÌ´Ù.

ÀÌÈ¥À» ¹Ý´ëÇÏ´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ ¿Ï°íÇÑ ÀÔÀåÀº ƯÈ÷ ±³È¸ ¹Û¿¡¼­ Áß¿äÇÑ ºñ³­ÀÇ Ç¥ÀûÀÌ µÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. È¥ÀÎ °è¾àÀÇ Á¶°ÇµéÀ» ¾ö°ÝÈ÷ ±ÔÁ¤ÇÔÀ¸·Î½á ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¹Î¹ý¿¡ ±ÔÁ¤µÇÁö ¾ÊÀº È¥Àι«È¿ÀÇ ±Ù°Å¸¦ °¡Áö°í ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

8) Holy orders

½Åǰ¼º»ç

This sacrament confers upon candidates the power over the sacred, which means the power to administer the sacraments. The Latin Church had long recognized four minor orders (porter, lector, exorcist, acolyte) and four major orders (subdeacon, deacon, priest, bishop). The minor orders represented church services rendered by persons not ordained. In 1972 Pope Paul VI issued the apostolic letter Ministeria quaedam, which abolished the major order of subdeacon and all minor orders and which created the lay liturgical ministries of lector and acolyte. Only the major orders are held to be sacramental, but they are regarded as one sacrament within which a tripartite hierarchy of sacramental effects is administered separately. Ordination is conferred only by the bishop; the rite includes the imposition of hands, anointing, and the delivery of the symbols of the order. The power of the sacred peculiar to the bishop is shown only in the sacraments of confirmation and orders. Ordination can neither be repeated nor annulled. Priests who are suspended from priestly powers or laicized (permanently authorized to live as a layman) retain their sacred power but are forbidden to exercise it except in emergency. The priest is always ordained to a "title," meaning that he is accepted in some ecclesiastical jurisdiction. Lectors and acolytes are instituted by a bishop or by the major superior of a clerical religious institute. Following a calling of the candidates, instruction, and prayer, lectors are presented a Bible and acolytes a vessel with bread or wine. (see also Index: holy order, clergy)

Other theological developments following the second Vatican Council concerned the ordination of women, against which no solid theological objection has been shown; the restoration of the permanent diaconate (with the powers to baptize, preach, and administer the Eucharist), to which both married and single men are admitted; and the idea of ordination for a fixed period of service. Except for the diaconate, these are radical suggestions in Roman Catholicism.

¡¡

ÀÌ ¼º»ç´Â ¼ºÁ÷ Èĺ¸Àڵ鿡°Ô ¼º¹«¿¡ °üÇÑ ±ÇÇÑ, Áï ¼º»ç¸¦ ÁýÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ½Å±Ç(ãêÏí)À» ºÎ¿©ÇÏ´Â °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼­Ç°(»çÁ¦Á÷ ¼öÀÓ)½ÄÀº ÁÖ±³¸¸ÀÌ ÁýÇàÇÒ ¼ö ÀÖÀ¸¸ç, ¼­Ç°½Ä¿¡´Â ¾È¼ö¿Í µµÀ¯, ¼ºÁ÷ÀÇ »ó¡ÀûÀÎ ¹°°ÇÀ» Àü´ÞÇÏ´Â ¿¹½ÄÀÌ Æ÷ÇԵȴÙ. ¼­Ç°½ÄÀº ¹Ýº¹µÇ°Å³ª ¹«È¿°¡ µÉ ¼ö ¾ø´Ù.

»çÁ¦Á÷ÀÇ ±ÇÇÑ Çà»ç¸¦ Á¤Áö´çÇÑ ½ÅºÎ³ª ȯ¼ÓÇÑ(¿µ¿øÈ÷ Æò½Åµµ·Î »ìµµ·Ï Çã¶ô¹ÞÀº) ½ÅºÎ´Â ¼ºÁ÷ ±ÇÇÑÀ» º¸À¯Çϰí´Â ÀÖÀ¸³ª ±ä±Þ½Ã¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇϰí´Â ±× Çà»ç°¡ ±ÝÁöµÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

8. PARALITURGICAL DEVOTIONS

Àü·Ê¿¡ ÁØÇÏ´Â ºÀÇåÀǽÄ

In the Roman Catholic Church, liturgy in the proper sense is the liturgy of the mass, the divine office, and the sacraments. The Latin language, the clerical character of the liturgy, and the search for novelty for hundreds of years have combined to produce forms of worship that are paraliturgical--by which is meant that they lie outside the liturgy and in some cases in opposition to it. These acts are also known as devotions or devotional practices, by which is meant that they are accepted voluntarily and not from obligation.

¡¡

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¿¡¼­ ¿ÂÀüÇÑ ÀǹÌÀÇ Àü·Ê´Â ¹Ì»çÀü·Ê, ¼ºÁ÷Àü·Ê, ¼º»ç(á¡ÞÀ)µéÀÌÁö¸¸, Àü·Ê¿¡ ÁØÇÏ´Â ¿¹¹è Çüŵ鵵 ¹ßÀüµÇ¾î ¿Ô´Ù. Àü·Ê¿¡ ÁØÇÑ´Ù´Â ¸»Àº ÀÌ ¿¹¹è ÇüŵéÀÌ Àü·Ê¿¡ ¼ÓÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í, ¾î¶² °æ¿ì¿¡´Â Àü·Ê¿Í ¹èÄ¡µÈ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¶æÇÑ´Ù. ÀÌ ÇàÀ§µéÀº ºÀÇåÀ̳ª ºÀÇåÀǽÄÀ̶ó°í ÀÏÄþîÁö±âµµ ÇÑ´Ù.

¡¡

1) Eucharistic devotions.

¼º¸¸Âù ºÀÇå

A number of eucharistic devotional practices arose in the Middle Ages, when Catholics rarely received the Eucharist more than once a year. These were cultic forms that were directed to the Real Presence of Jesus in the Eucharist rather than to sacrifice and Holy Communion. Such were Benediction of the Blessed Sacrament and "exposition." Benediction was a blessing conferred by a priest holding a consecrated Host in a vessel of display called the monstrance; the priest's hands were covered to signify that it was the blessing of Jesus and not his own. This blessing was accompanied by hymns and the use of the organ and incense. Exposition was the public and solemn display of the eucharistic bread, again with the accompaniment of hymns, the organ, incense, and processions. The reservation of the Eucharist in churches was a way in which Catholics could address themselves in personal prayer to Jesus really present. These have often functioned as substitutes for mass and Holy Communion, and since the modern renewal of liturgy they occur much less frequently.

¡¡

¼º¸¸Âù ºÀÇåÀÇ½Ä Áß¿¡´Â Ãູ¹ÞÀº ¼º»çÀÇ ¼ºÃ¼°­º¹½Ä°ú 'Áø¿­'ÀÌ ÀÖ°í, Âù¼Û, ¿À¸£°£ ¹ÝÁÖ, Çâ, Çà·ÄÀÌ µ¿¹ÝµÇ´Â ¼º¸¸Âù »§ÀÇ Àå¾öÇÑ °ø°³°¡ ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

2) Cult of the saints.

¼ºÀÎ ¼þ¹è

Other devotions revolve about the cult of the saints, a practice repudiated by the Reformers as a denial of the total mediation of Christ. This objection oversimplified Catholic practice, but the devotions did sometimes approach superstition. Catholic theologians distinguish (by Greek technical terms) the worship paid to God (latria, "adoration") from the veneration addressed to Mary (hyperdulia, "super-service") and the saints (dulia, "service"). Protestants do not disagree with the principle of admitting the saints as examples of genuine Christianity, but they reject the intercession of the saints as utterly superfluous and ineffective. The Roman Catholic understanding of the intercession of the saints is an extension of the belief in the communion of saints. Although such veneration does tend to multiply mediators, it has often fostered a simple and not unpleasing familiarity with the world of the supernatural. The excesses of the cult of Mary have stirred up controversy, and the tendency to superstition and the deification of Mary have sometimes been painfully present. Mary represents the feminine principle in Roman Catholicism; often in other religions this principle has been personified as a goddess. Mary is given the feminine traits of sympathy and tenderness that are not improper to the deity but are somewhat improper to the father figure and the king figure. The multitude of apparitions of Mary (e.g., at Lourdes, Fr., and Fatima, Port.) come from the need of a local and national symbol of presence, which enables the Roman Catholics of a nation or region to identify with Mary. Because Mary as a historical person is almost totally unknown, Catholics have been able to find in her all the traits of the ideal person that they needed to find. (see also Index: cult of saints, veneration of the saints)

Roman Catholicism has always insisted on its right to official supervision of devotional cults, and only approved forms of devotions may be used in the churches or under clerical auspices. Approval does not imply the historical reality of the vision or apparition involved; no Roman Catholic is obliged to believe that Mary appeared to anyone at Lourdes or Fatima, that the rosary (prayer beads) was delivered by a private revelation, or that Jesus manifested himself as the Sacred Heart. Nor is any Catholic obliged to practice any of these devotions. Generally, they serve the purpose of emphasizing some element of Christian faith that is obscured in the preaching and the liturgy at a particular time and place. Devotion to the Sacred Heart, for example, turned the attention of Catholics to the humanity of Jesus and to Christian love in the somewhat arid spirituality of the 17th and 18th centuries. It may be urged that more authentic biblical proclamation would have brought out these things; Roman Catholicism has often manifested itself through devotions when authentic biblical preaching was not available. In approving devotions the Roman Catholic Church simply declares that they are not in conflict with Roman Catholic faith and morals. It does not deny that they may be entirely products of the imagination.

¡¡

±×¹ÛÀÇ ºÀÇåÀǽĵéÀº ¼ºÀμþ¹è¸¦ Áß½ÉÀ¸·Î ÀÌ·ç¾îÁö´Âµ¥, Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀº ±×¸®½ºµµÀÇ ¿ÏÀüÇÑ ÁßÀ縦 ºÎÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù°í ÇÏ¿© ¼ºÀμþ¹è¸¦ ºñ³­Çß´Ù. ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÚµéÀÇ ¹Ý´ë´Â °¡Å縯 ÀǽÄ(ëðãÒ)À» Áö³ªÄ¡°Ô ´Ü¼øÈ­ÇÑ °ÍÀÌÁö¸¸, ºÀÇå ÀǽĵéÀÌ ¹Ì½Å¿¡ °¡±î¿öÁø °æ¿ìµµ ÈçÈ÷ ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. °¡Å縯 ½ÅÇÐÀÚµéÀº ÇÏ´À´Ô²² ¹ÙÄ¡´Â ¿¹¹è¿Í ¸¶¸®¾Æ³ª ¼ºÀε鿡 ´ëÇÑ °æ¸ð¸¦ ¼­·Î ±¸º°ÇÑ´Ù. °³½Å±³µµµéÀº ¼ºÀεéÀ» ÂüµÈ ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ Á¤½ÅÀÇ ¸ð¹üÀ¸·Î º¸´Â ¿ø¸®¸¦ °ÅºÎÇÏÁö´Â ¾ÊÁö¸¸, ¼ºÀεéÀÇ °³ÀÔÀº ÀüÀûÀ¸·Î ºÒÇÊ¿äÇÏ°í ¾Æ¹«·± È¿·ÂÀÌ ¾ø´Ù°í ¸ø¹Ú´Â´Ù. ¼ºÀεéÀÇ °³ÀÔ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯ÀÇ ÀÌÇØ´Â ¼ºÀεéÀÇ Ä£±³¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ½Å¾ÓÀ» È®´ë½ÃŲ °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼ºÀε鿡 ´ëÇÑ °æ¸ð½ÉÀº ¿¹¼ö ±×¸®½ºµµ¶ó´Â ´Ü ÇϳªÀÇ ÁßÀçÀÚ À̿ܿ¡ ¿©·¯ ÁßÀçÀÚµéÀ» »óÁ¤Çϵµ·Ï ÇÏ´Â °æÇâÀÌ ÀÖ±â´Â ÇÏÁö¸¸, ÃÊÀÚ¿¬Àû ¼¼°è¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¼Ò¹ÚÇϰí À¯ÄèÇÑ Ä£¹Ð°¨À» Á¶¼ºÇؿ °Íµµ »ç½ÇÀÌ´Ù.

Áö³ªÄ£ µ¿Á¤³à ¸¶¸®¾Æ ¼þ¹è´Â ¸¹Àº ³í¶õÀ» ºÒ·¯ÀÏÀ¸ÄÑ ¿Ô°í, °íÅ뽺·¯¿î ÀÏÀ̱â´Â ÇÏÁö¸¸ ¹Ì½ÅÀÇ °æÇâÀ» ¶ì°Å³ª ¸¶¸®¾Æ¸¦ ½Å°ÝÈ­ÇÏ´Â ÀÏÀÌ Á¾Á¾ ³ªÅ¸³ª±âµµ Çß´Ù. ¸¶¸®¾Æ´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¿¡¼­ ¿©¼ºÀÇ ¿ø¸®¸¦ ´ëÇ¥ÇÑ´Ù. ´Ù¸¥ Á¾±³¿¡¼­µµ ÀÌ ¿ø¸®°¡ ¿©½ÅÀ¸·Î ÀΰÝÈ­µÇ´Â °æ¿ì°¡ ÈçÇÏ´Ù. ¸¶¸®¾Æ¿¡°Ô´Â µ¿Á¤½É°ú ºÎµå·¯¿ò °°Àº ¿©¼ºÀÇ Æ¯Â¡ÀÌ ºÎ¿©µÇ¾î ÀÖ´Ù. ÀÌ Æ¯Â¡Àº ¾Æ¹öÁö³ª ¿ÕÀÇ À̹ÌÁö¿¡´Â ¾î¿ï¸®Áö ¾ÊÁö¸¸ ½Å¿¡°Ô ºÎÀûÇÕÇÑ °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. ¸¶¸®¾Æ°¡ ¿©·¯ Â÷·Ê ÃâÇöÇÑ °Í(¿¹¸¦ µé¸é, ÇÁ¶û½ºÀÇ ·çÁî, Æ÷¸£Åõ°¥ÀÇ ÆÄƼ¸¶)Àº ¾î¶² Áö¿ª ȤÀº ±¹°¡¿¡¼­ ¸¶¸®¾Æ ÀÓÀçÀÇ »ó¡À» ÇÊ¿ä·Î ÇÑ °Í¿¡¼­ ºñ·ÔµÈ Çö»óÀ̸ç, ±× Áö¿ª ȤÀº ±¹°¡ÀÇ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯±³µµµéÀº ±×¿Í °°Àº ÀÓÀ縦 ¸¶¸®¾Æ¿Í µ¿ÀϽÃÇß´Ù. ¿ª»çÀû Àι°·Î¼­ ¸¶¸®¾Æ¿¡ ´ëÇØ¼­´Â °ÅÀÇ ¾Æ¹« °Íµµ ¾Ë·ÁÁ® ÀÖÁö ¾Ê±â ¶§¹®¿¡, °¡Å縯 ±³µµµéÀº ±×µéÀÌ Ã£¾Æ¾ß ÇÒ ÀÌ»óÀûÀÎ Àι°ÀÇ ¸ðµç ƯÁúÀ» ¸¶¸®¾Æ¿¡°Ô¼­ ãÀ» ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´ø °ÍÀÌ´Ù.

·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ¾ðÁ¦³ª ºÀÇåÀǽĵ鿡 ´ëÇÑ °ø½ÄÀûÀÎ °¨µ¶±ÇÀ» ÁÖÀåÇØ¿Ô´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸°¡ ÀÎÁ¤ÇÑ´Ù°í ÇØ¼­ ȯ»óÀ̳ª ÃâÇöÀÇ ¿ª»çÀû ½ÇÀ缺ÀÌ ÀúÀý·Î È®º¸µÇ´Â °ÍÀº ¾Æ´Ï´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯±³µµ´Â ¸¶¸®¾Æ°¡ ·çÁ ÆÄƼ¸¶ÀÇ ´©±¸¿¡°Õ°¡ ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ¹Ï¾î¾ß ÇÒ Àǹ«°¡ ¾øÀ¸¸ç, ·Î»ç¸®¿À(±âµµ¿ë ¹¬ÁÖ)°¡ »çÀû(ÞçîÜ)ÀÎ °è½Ã¸¦ ÅëÇØ Àü´ÞµÇ¾ú´Ù°Å³ª ¿¹¼ö°¡ ¼º½º·¯¿î ÇÏÆ® ¸ð¾çÀ¸·Î ÀÚ½ÅÀ» µå·¯³Â´Ù°í ¹Ï¾î¾ß ÇÒ Àǹ«µµ ¾ø´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡Å縯±³µµµéÀº ÀÌ ºÀÇåÀÇ½Ä Áß ¾î´À Çϳª¸¦ Àǹ«ÀûÀ¸·Î ½ÇÇàÇÒ Çʿ䰡 ¾ø´Ù. ´ëü·Î ÀÌ ºÀÇåÀǽĵéÀº ƯÁ¤ÇÑ ½Ã°£°ú Àå¼Ò¿¡¼­ ÇàÇØÁö´Â °­·Ð°ú Àü·Ê¸¦ ÅëÇØ ±× ¶æÀÌ ¸íÈ®ÇÏ°Ô ¹àÇôÁöÁö ¾Ê´Â ±×¸®½ºµµ±³ ½Å¾ÓÀÇ ¸î °¡Áö ¿ä¼Ò¸¦ °­Á¶ÇÏ´Â µ¥ À̹ÙÁöÇÑ´Ù.

¡¡

3) Mysticism.

½ÅºñÁÖÀÇ

The search for God through mysticism has never been received cordially by the official Roman Catholic Church. In general terms, the mystical experience can be described as a direct experience of the reality of the divine. A sufficient number of mystics have been proved fraudulent to justify caution but not to justify a blanket antecedent disapproval. Every saint who has been recognized as a mystic had some trouble with church authority. Indeed, one may see in the mystical experience of God something that the official church can neither furnish nor control. In addition, mystics have often had a prophetic character that expressed itself in criticism of abuses in the official church. Whatever the explanation, mystical phenomena have become extremely rare in the modern Roman Catholic Church. (see also Index: Christianity)

¡¡

9. THE ROLE OF THE CHURCH IN SOCIETY

±³È¸ÀÇ »çȸÀû ¿ªÇÒ

1) Missions.

¼±±³

From its beginnings Christianity alone among the great religions has regarded itself as a true world religion that appeals to all men without distinction of race, nation, or culture. Roman Catholicism believes that it has preserved this missionary thrust more faithfully than any of the non-Roman churches. From the 4th to the 10th century the Roman Church devoted itself to the evangelization of the barbarians. The barbarians wished to become "Roman," and they accepted the church as a component of Roman civilization. The spread of Islam was met with crusades and not with missionaries, and the Roman Catholic Church has never mounted more than a feeble missionary effort toward Muslims. Thus, the missionary movement languished from the 10th to the 16th century; but the ages of the expansion of Europe, in which the Catholic countries were the early leaders, spread Roman Catholicism to the Americas, Asia, Oceania, and Africa. (see also Index: colonialism)

This missionary effort differed from both the New Testament missions and the missions to the European barbarians in its very close, centralized control by the Roman see. Missionary churches have begun to achieve that independence proper to the diocesan structure only in the 20th century. It has been difficult for the Roman Catholic missions to divorce themselves from colonialism, and many missionaries did not want the divorce. Again until recent times most of the clergy and all the hierarchy in mission countries were European or American, as were the heads of educational and benevolent operations. Even the peoples of the mission countries, including their clergy and religious personnel, generally wished to give their church a European identity rather than an Asian or African identity. The Roman see, which had suppressed efforts to admit Chinese rites in the 18th century, was unsympathetic to what appeared to be "non-Roman" practices. The second Vatican Council officially ended the colonial phase of missions; in practice, however, the end will take longer. Where possible--meaning where the personnel are available--the operation of the mission churches has been given to native hierarchy and clergy.

¡¡

±×¸®½ºµµ±³´Â ÃʱâºÎÅÍ ´ëÁ¾±³µé °¡¿îµ¥¼­ À¯ÀÏÇÏ°Ô ÀÎÁ¾°ú ±¹°¡ ¶Ç´Â ¹®È­ÀÇ ±¸º°¾øÀÌ ¸¸ÀÎÀ» ÇâÇØ È£¼ÒÇÏ´Â ÁøÁ¤ÇÑ ¼¼°è Á¾±³ÀÓÀ» ÀÚÀÓÇØ¿Ô´Ù. ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ ¼±±³ ÃßÁø·ÂÀ» ¾î¶² ºñ°¡Å縯 ±³È¸µéº¸´Ù ´õ Ãæ½ÇÈ÷ °£Á÷ÇØ¿Ô´Ù°í ¹Ï°í ÀÖ´Ù. Á¦2Â÷ ¹ÙƼĭ °øÀÇȸ´Â ½Ä¹ÎÁÖÀÇÀûÀÎ ¼±±³ÇüŸ¦ °ø½ÄÀûÀ¸·Î Á¾½Ä½ÃÄ×´Ù. ±×·¯³ª ½ÇÁ¦ÀûÀ¸·Î À̸¦ ¿ÏÀüÈ÷ Á¾½ÄÇϱâ±îÁö´Â ½Ã°£ÀÌ ´õ °É¸± °ÍÀÌ´Ù. ¼±±³Áö¿¡¼­ ¹èÃâµÈ ÀλçµéÀÌ ÃæºÐÇÑ ¼±±³ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­´Â ±³È¸ÀÇ ¿î¿µÀ» ÅäÂøÀûÀÎ À§°èÁú¼­¿Í ¼ºÁ÷Àڵ鿡°Ô ÀÏÀÓÇØ¿À°í ÀÖ´Ù.

¡¡

2) Education.

±³À°

Between the barbarian invasions and the Protestant Reformation, education in Europe, except for the Arabic and Jewish centres of learning, was conducted by Roman Catholicism. Learning during the early Middle Ages was preserved by the monasteries; and, although the monks did little more than copy the manuscripts of Greek and Latin pagan writers and of the Church Fathers, they educated the few people who had any learning. The foundation of the European universities after 1200 was also the work of Roman Catholicism; these institutions were stimulated by the learning of Arabic scholars, through whom Europeans became acquainted with the philosophy of Aristotle and produced the learning of Scholastic philosophy and theology. The cultivation of literature and the arts in the 15th century flourished under the patronage of the papacy and Catholic princes and prelates. (see also Index: education, history of , parochial education)

The birth of modern science was coincidental with the Reformation and the age of the expansion of Europe. The Roman Catholic response to the new science, accompanied by new philosophical systems, was hostile; and the world of European learning after 1600 was dissociated from the Roman Catholic Church, which patronized only defensive learning. At the same time, Roman Catholic initiatives in educating the poor were gaining momentum. The invention of printing had diffused education far beyond earlier possibilities, and the churches were all interested in reaching the minds of the young. This interest was matched after the French Revolution by the modern states, which in the 19th century moved toward the exclusion of church influence from education. But the Roman Catholic Church, through its religious communities, was a pioneer in the elementary education of the children of the poor.

In the 20th century the Roman Catholic educational endeavour in many European and American countries, particularly in the United States, had become a vast enterprise. In the second half of the 20th century, however, mounting costs and diminished religious personnel created critical problems for Catholic schools, and even their survival was at stake in many regions. The problems were not lightened by the realization that Roman Catholic education, even where it was strongest, reached only a minority of Catholic students; and the Roman Church had to face its established reputation as an adversary of the intellectual freedom that the modern academic world cherishes.

¡¡

¾ß¸¸Á·ÀÇ Ä§ÀÔºÎÅÍ ÇÁ·ÎÅ×½ºÅºÆ® Á¾±³°³ÇõÀÌ ¹ß»ýÇϱâ±îÁö ¿À·£ ±â°£ µ¿¾È À¯·´ÀÇ ±³À°Àº ¾Æ¶øÁ·°ú À¯´ëÀεéÀÇ Çй® Áß½ÉÁö¸¦ Á¦¿ÜÇϰí´Â ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¿¡ ÀÇÇØ ½Ç½ÃµÇ¾ú´Ù. 15¼¼±âÀÇ ¹®Çаú ¿¹¼úÀº ±³È²±Ç°ú °¡Å縯 ±ºÁÖµé ¹× °íÀ§¼ºÁ÷ÀÚµéÀÇ ÈÄ¿øÀ¸·Î ²ÉÀ» ÇÇ¿ü´Ù.

Çö´ë °úÇÐÀÇ Åµ¿Àº Á¾±³°³Çõ ¹× À¯·´ÀÇ ÆØÃ¢½Ã±â¿Í µ¿½Ã¿¡ ÀÌ·ç¾îÁ³´Ù. »õ·Î¿î öÇРü°è¸¦ µ¿¹ÝÇÑ »õ·Î¿î °úÇп¡ ´ëÇÑ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ ¹ÝÀÀÀº Àû´ëÀûÀÎ °ÍÀ̾ú´Ù. 1600³â ÀÌÈÄ À¯·´ÀÇ Çй®¼¼°è´Â ¿À·ÎÁö ½Å¾Ó ¼öÈ£¸¦ À§ÇÑ Çй®¸¸À» º¸È£ÇÏ¿´´ø ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸¿Í °áº°Çß´Ù.

20¼¼±â¿¡ µé¾î¼­ À¯·´°ú ¾Æ¸Þ¸®Ä« Áö¿ªÀÇ ¿©·¯ ³ª¶óµé, ƯÈ÷ ¹Ì±¹¿¡¼­ ±³À°À» À§ÇÑ ·Î¸¶ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸ÀÇ ³ë·ÂÀº ÇϳªÀÇ ¹æ´ëÇÑ »ç¾÷ÀÌ µÇ¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª 20¼¼±â ÈĹݱ⿡ µé¾î¿Í¼­´Â ±³À° °æºñÀÇ ±Þµî°ú ±³À°±â°ü¿¡ Á¾»çÇÏ´Â ½ÅÀÚ Á÷¿øµéÀÇ °¨¼Ò·Î ÀÎÇØ °¡Å縯 Çб³µéÀº ½É°¢ÇÑ ¾î·Á¿ò¿¡ Á÷¸éÇÏ°Ô µÇ¾ú°í, ¿©·¯ Áö¿ª¿¡¼­´Â Çб³ÀÇ Á¸¸³¸¶Àú À§ÅÂ·Ó°Ô µÇ¾ú´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¡Å縯 ±³È¸´Â Çö´ëÀÇ Çй®¼¼°è°¡ ¼ÒÁßÈ÷ ¿©±â´Â ÁöÀûÀÎ ÀÚÀ¯¿¡ ¿ªÇàÇÑ´Ù´Â ±âÁ¸ÀÇ ÆòÆÇ¿¡ ´ëÃ³ÇØ¾ß Çß´Ù.

¡¡

3) Eleemosynary activities.

ÀÚ¼±È°µ¿

I